期刊文献+

玻璃化法冻融小鼠桑葚胚期和囊胚期胚胎的效果观察 被引量:1

Cryopreservation of mouse morula and blastocysts by vitrification
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 比较玻璃化法冻融小鼠桑葚胚期、囊胚早期和囊胚期胚胎后,胚胎存活及继续发育的能力。方法应用6 mol/L乙二醇和1 mol/L蔗糖的玻璃化冷冻液,冻融小鼠142个桑葚胚期、135个囊胚早期和148个囊胚期胚胎,观察冻融后胚胎存活及继续发育的情况。结果 小鼠桑葚胚期、囊胚早期和囊胚期胚胎的存活率分别为88.0%、73.3%和60.1%,囊胚孵出率分别为73.9%、61.5%和49.3%。桑葚胚期的胚胎存活率及囊胚孵出率均高于囊胚早期,囊胚早期高于囊胚期,各期胚胎存活率、囊胚孵出率比较,差异均有显著性(P<0.05)。结论 玻璃化法冻融桑葚胚期的效果好于囊胚早期及囊胚期,桑葚胚期是卵裂期后胚胎玻璃化冻融的最佳阶段。 Objective To compare the survival and developmental potential of mouse morula, early blastocysts and blastocysts cryopreserved by vitrification. Methods One hundred and forty-two mouse morula, 135 early blastocysts and 148 blastocysts were cryopreserved by 6 mol/L ethylene glycol and 1 mol/L sucrose vitrification solutions. The survival rates and blastocysts hatching rates after thawing were observed. Results The survival rates of morula, early blastocysts and blastocysts groups were 88. 0% ,73. 3% ,and 60. 1% respectively. The blastocyst hatching rates were 73. 9% , 61. 5% ,and 49. 3% respectively. Both the survival rates and blastocyst hatching rates in morula group were higher than those in early blastocysts group (P < 0. 05 ) , and they were higher in early blastocysts group than in blastocysts group ( P < 0. 05 ) . Conclusions In these three embryo stages, the survival and developmental potential of mouse morula cryopreserved by vitrification are better than those of early blastocysts and blastocysts. Morula is likely the most feasible stage for embryo vitrification.
出处 《中华妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第8期526-528,共3页 Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词 早期 胚胎存活率 小鼠 囊胚期 效果观察 存活 发育 卵裂期 玻璃化 显著性 Cryopreservation Mice Morula Blastocyst
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB, Wagley L, et al. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod, 1998,13: 3434-3440.
  • 2Desai N, Lawson J, Goldfarb J, et al. Assessment of growth factor effects on post-thaw development of cryopreserved mouse morulae to the blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod,2000,15:410-418.
  • 3Vanderzwalmen P, Bertin G, Debauche CH, et al. Births after vitrification at morula and blastocyst stages: effect of artificial reduction of the blastocoelic cavity before vitrification. Hum Reprod,2002 ,17:744-751.
  • 4Kasai M, Ito K, Edashige K. Morphological appearance of the cryopreserved mouse blastocyst as a tool to identify the type of cryoinjury. Hum Reprod, 2002,17:1863-1874.
  • 5Emiliani S, Van den Bergh M, Vannin AS, et al. Comparison of ethylene glycol, 1,2-propanediol and glycerol for cryopreservation of slow-cooled mouse zygotes, 4-cell embryos and blastocysts. Hum Reprod, 2000 , 15:905-910.
  • 6Tao J, Tamis R, Fink K. Cryopreservation of mouse embryos at morula/compact stage. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2001 ,18:235-243.
  • 7Han MS, Niwa K, Kasai M. Vitrification of rat embryos at various developmental stages. Theriogenology, 2003,59:1851-1863.
  • 8Cocero M J, Diaz de la Espina SM, Aguilar B. Ultrastructural characteristics of fresh and frozen-thawed ovine embryos using two cryoprotectants. Biol Reprod, 2002,66:1244-1258.
  • 9Ali J, Shelton JN. Vitrification of preimplantation stages of mouse embryos. J Reprod Fertil, 1993,98:459-465.

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部