期刊文献+

论构建我国民事诉讼中的自足性审前程序——审前程序和庭审程序并立的改革观 被引量:44

On the Construction of the Pretrial Procedure with the Nature of Self-sufficiency in the Civil Procedure of China——The Idea of Reform:Coexistence of Pretrial Procedure and Court Trial Procedure
原文传递
导出
摘要 传统的审前程序是为庭审作准备而存在的 ,其工具性价值成为惟一的功利追求 ,审前程序的功能因此而受到限制。这种功能观也制约了审前程序的模式设置 ,我国审前程序的过分职权化的倾向是与审前程序功能单一化期待有密切联系 ,其结果便造成了审前程序的可有可无及其机能萎缩。我国民事诉讼程序结构应当改变绝对的庭审中心主义 ,要彰显审前程序所具有的化解纠纷和分流讼源的功能 ,将法院实体审判权前移 ,使之贯穿始终 ,只要案件处在成熟的可审判状态 ,法院均应相机行使实体审判权 。 Traditional pretrial procedure is for the preparation of court trial. The instrumental value thereof becomes the only pursuit of utility. The function of pretrial procedure has been limited by it. Such concept concerning the function has some influence on the mode establishment of pretrial procedure. The tendency of the pretrial procedure with the excessive characteristics of functions and powers is closely related to the supposed pretrial procedure with one function, which leads to the result that pretrial is indispensable and its functions atrophy. The structure of civil procedure of China should substitute for the absolute doctrine of court trial centered, but make evident the function of pretrial procedure of resolving disputes and distributing action sources. The substantial adjudicative power of courts should be advanced and made to penetrate throughout the whole process. If only a case is in a mature justiciable state, courts shall exercise their substantial adjudicative power to resolve disputes.
作者 汤维建
机构地区 中国人民大学
出处 《政法论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第4期16-23,共8页 Tribune of Political Science and Law
关键词 民事诉讼 审前程序 独立性 庭审程序 庭审中心主义 Pretrial Procedure Independence Self-sufficiency Resolving Dispute
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献78

共引文献902

引证文献44

二级引证文献117

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部