期刊文献+

血管内皮生长因子受体-3与胃癌临床病理因素的关系 被引量:5

Expression and Significance of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3 in Gastric Carcinoma
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 探讨血管内皮生长因子受体 3(VEGFR 3)与胃癌临床病理因素的关系。方法 应用免疫组织化学SP法测定胃癌及胃良性病变中VEGFR 3的表达 ,并以此来计数淋巴管密度。结果 淋巴管密度胃癌组为( 5 .80 0 0± 2 .3189)个 /× 2 0 0 ,胃良性病变组为 ( 2 .380 0± 0 .4 6 2 9)个 /× 2 0 0 (P =0 .0 0 0 ) ;有淋巴结转移者为 ( 6 .94 83± 1.5 831)个 /× 2 0 0 ,无淋巴结转移者为 ( 2 .772 7± 0 .4 2 89)个 /× 2 0 0 (P =0 .0 0 0 ) ;低分化组为( 7.6 818± 0 .982 9)个 /× 2 0 0 ,高 +中分化组为 ( 3.5 0 0 0± 1.0 2 82 )个 /× 2 0 0 (P =0 .0 0 0 ) ;pTNM分期Ⅰ +Ⅱ期为( 4 .2 917± 1.6 880 )个 /× 2 0 0 ,Ⅲ +Ⅳ期组为 ( 8.0 6 2 5± 0 .75 94 )个 /× 2 0 0 (P =0 .0 0 0 )。结论 胃癌淋巴管密度与其 pTNM分期。 Objective To investigate the relationship between vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 (VEGFR 3) and clinical pathology of gastric carcinoma(GC).Methods The expression of VEGFR 3 in 80 GCs and 20 gastric benign tissues (GBT) was detected by immunohistochemistry(SP), by which the density of lymphatic vessels (DLV) was calculated. Results The DLV in GC was (5.800 0±2.318 9)/×200, in GBT (2.380 0± 0.462 9) /×200( P =0.000); in GC with lymph node metastasis (6.948 3±1.583 1)/×200, without lymph node metastasis (2.772 7±0.428 9)/×200 ( P =0.000). In poorly differentiated type group, DLV was (7.681 8± 0.982 9) /×200, higher than that in moderately and highly differentiated type group 〔(3.500 0±1.028 2)/×200, P=0.000〕. DLV in pTNM Ⅰ+Ⅱ was (4.291 7±1.688 0)/×200, in Ⅲ+Ⅳ (8.062 5±0.759 4)/×200 ( P =0.000).Conclusion DLV shows positive relations with pTNM stage, differentiation and lymph node metastasis of GC.
出处 《中国普外基础与临床杂志》 CAS 2004年第4期341-343,共3页 Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics In General Surgery
关键词 血管内皮生长因子受体-3 胃癌 病理因素 免疫组织化学 测定 淋巴管生成 Gastric tumor Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 Lymphangiogenesis Immunohistochemistry
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献53

  • 1[1]Lichtenbeld HC,Barendsz JAF,Van EN.Angigenic potential of malignant and non-malignant human breast tissues an in vivo angiogenesis model [J]. Int J Cancer,1998; 77(4) ∶ 445
  • 2[2]Gruinelbretieve JM,Monique G,Gavoille A,et al.angiogenesis and risk of breast cancer in women with fibrocystic disease [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst,1994; 86(8) ∶ 635
  • 3[3]Grurid AJ,Fisher L,Harris JR.Microvessel density and distribution in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst,1994; 86(8) ∶ 614
  • 4[4]Jensen HM,Chen L,Devault MR.Angiogenesis induced by normal human breast tissue.A probable marker for precancer [J]. Science,1982; 218(4569) ∶ 293
  • 5[5]Wang G,Dong Z,Xu G,et al.The effect of antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor on tumor growth and metastasis [J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol,1998; 124(11) ∶ 615
  • 6[6]Brown L,Berse B,Jackman R.Expression of VPF/VEGF and its receptor in breast cancer [J]. Hum Pathol,1995; 26(1) ∶ 86
  • 7[7]Kurebayashi J, Otsuki T, Kumisue H. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family members in breast cancer [J]. Jpn J Cancer Res,1999; 90(9) ∶ 977
  • 8[1]Norton JA. Tumor angiogenesis [J]. Ann Surg, 1995; 222(6)∶693
  • 9[2]Mooteri H, Rubin D, Leurgans S, et al. Tumor angiogenesis in primary and metastatic colorectal cancers [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1996; 39(10)∶1073
  • 10[3]Weidner N, Folkman J, Pozza F, et al. Tumor angiogenesis: a new significant and independent prognostic indicator in early-stage breast carcinoma [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst,1992; 84(8)∶1875

共引文献73

同被引文献94

引证文献5

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部