期刊文献+

评价中心的评分维度和评分效果 被引量:13

The Rating Dimensions and Rating Effects of the Assessment Center
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 对近年来国内外关于评价中心的研究进行了比较系统的介绍。首先,文章讨论了评分维度的数目对于评分结果的影响,以及评价中心中的4个元维度;其次,介绍了评价中心中衡量评分效果的指标,并讨论了评分者培训的分类及其对评分效果的影响;第三,虽然评价中心具有良好的效标关联效度,但对于其结构效度的研究至今尚无统一结论。最后,文章对评价中心未来的研究趋势进行了探讨。 This article reviews the research on the Assessment Center (AC) in these years. First, it discusses the impact of the number of dimensions on rating results and the four meta-dimensions in AC. Second, it introduces the indexes of rating accuracy in AC and expounds different types of rater training programs and their impact on rating accuracy. Third, although AC has proved good criterion-related validity, the research on its construct validity has not yet reached an agreement. Finally, it discusses the trend of future research briefly.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2004年第4期601-607,共7页 Advances in Psychological Science
关键词 评价中心 评分维度 评分者培训 效度 assessment center, dimensions, rater training, validity.
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1[1]Task Force on Assessment Center Guidelines. Guidelines and Ethical Considerations for Assessment Center Operations, 1989. 1~2
  • 2[2]Russell C J. Individual Decision Processes in an Assessment Center. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985, 70:737~746
  • 3[3]Gaugler B B, Thornton Ⅲ G C. Number of Assessment Center Dimensions as a Determinant of Assessor Accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 74:611~618
  • 4[5]Jansen P, Jongh F D. Assessment Centers: A Practical Handbook. JOHN WILEY & SONS, 1997.25~26
  • 5[6]Ryan A M, Daurn D B, Todd G. Direct, Indirect, and Controlled Observation and Rating Accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology,1995, 80:664~670
  • 6[7]Lievens F. Assessor Training Strategies and Their Effects on Accuracy, Interrater Reliability, and Discriminant Validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86:255~264
  • 7[8]Schleicher D J, Day D V. A New Frame for Frame-Of-Reference Training: Enhancing the Construct Validity of Assessment Centers.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87:735~746
  • 8[9]Murphy K R. Criterion Issues in Performance Appraisal Research: Behavioral Accuracy Versus Classification Accuracy.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50:45~50
  • 9[10]Thornton Ⅲ G C, Zorich S. Training to Improve Observer Accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65:351~354
  • 10[11]Sulsky L M, Day D V. Frame-of-reference Training and Cognitive Categorization: An Empirical Investigation of Rater Memory Issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1992, 77:501~510

同被引文献134

引证文献13

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部