摘要
中国学术界主流观点认为,辩护人是独立的诉讼参与人。这种对辩护人地位的认识导致司法实践中出现了被告人与辩护律师在法庭上"各说各话"的现象。美国刑事诉讼中也出现过被告人与辩护律师意见冲突的实例,并且也具备解决这一问题的相应原则。《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》虽经二次修正,但是都未明确"辩护人诉讼地位"。由于现行法律未能明确规定这一问题,就需要根据现行法律关于辩护和代理的规定来分析我国对被告人与辩护律师意见冲突的态度。
The idea of 'defense attorney is an independent participant in criminal procedure' is a common view among academics in China.However,this opinion leads to the conflict between the defense attorney and defendant himself.This phenomenon also exists in American criminal procedure,and American law system constructs a series of rules to solve this kind of problem.Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China has been amended for three times,it doesn't give the exact answer of 'the role of defense attorney'.Because of existing law's ambiguity,the idea of solving his problem must be based on current provisions of defense and agent in the existing law.
出处
《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》
2013年第4期93-96,共4页
Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
关键词
被告人
辩护律师
意见冲突
defendant
defense attorney
opinion conflict
