摘要
所谓的"可VP"类疑问句式实为在句中"谓头"句法位置执行"添加"句法手段所造成的结果。既不能把它归入反复问句,也不能归入是非问句,它压根就不是静态的句式。它因同样使用谓头位置而跟反复问句拥有一些相似特点,因同样使用"添加"句法手段而跟带"吗"的是非问句而表现出某些共性。其独特的属性先天性地决定了无论是把它归入反复问句还是是非问句,都能找得出理由,不管把它归入哪种疑问句式都会遇到困难。作为用于谓头位置的疑问副词,"可"类词本身应该存在跨方言的差异。在某些方言中它是一个纯正典型的疑问副词,跟其他疑问句法手段相排斥;在另外一些方言中,它是被弱化了的半个疑问助词,只是兼有疑问功能,它因此而跟其他疑问句法手段在同一句子中合用。
It has been argued in this paper that the so-called'Ke(可)-VP'interrogative observed in some Chinese dialects is in fact a result of insertion of a question particle in a predicate-initial position.This type of question,with its own distinctive characteristics and syntactic operations, should not be categorized either under alternative question or yes-no question.As a question particle used in a predicate-initial position,words like'ke(可)'exhibit cross-dialectal differences.It is a typical and pure question particle and is used mutual-exclusively with other interrogative devices in some Chinese dialects.Whereas in other dialects it is only a quasi question particle,weakened semantically and syntactically,assuming some other semantic functions than being a question device.
出处
《汉语学报》
CSSCI
2011年第2期60-70,96,共12页
Chinese Linguistics
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“语法原则与汉语特殊句式”基金资助(项目批准号:2009JJD740011)
关键词
“可VP”问句
反复问句
是非问句
谓头位置
'Ke(可)-VP' interrogative
alternative question
yes-no question
predicate-initial position
