The Lenzing Group,a leading supplier of regenerated cellulosic fibers for the textile and nonwovens industries,has unveiled innov ative fabric blends that address one of fashion's most persistent circularity chall...The Lenzing Group,a leading supplier of regenerated cellulosic fibers for the textile and nonwovens industries,has unveiled innov ative fabric blends that address one of fashion's most persistent circularity challenges:maintaining premium quality while incorporating significant recycled dontent.Through strategic manufacturing partnerships,Lenzing has successfully demonstrated how its responsibly sourlced and resource-efficiently produced TENCEL Im Lyocell fibers transform the unpredictable quality of mechanically recycled natural fibers into consistent,commercially-viable fabrics.展开更多
The effect of seismic directionality is crucial for curved bridges,a subject generally overlooked in seismic vulnerability analysis.This paper focuses on seismic fragility development as a function of seismic incidenc...The effect of seismic directionality is crucial for curved bridges,a subject generally overlooked in seismic vulnerability analysis.This paper focuses on seismic fragility development as a function of seismic incidence directions for a geometrically curved bridge.A series of non-linear time history analyses were carried out for a representative finite element model of the bridge by considering actual ground motions.For reliable seismic demand models,a total of eleven intensity measures(IM)were analyzed based on optimality metrics.To quantify the sensitivity of fragility functions to input incidence directions,fragility surfaces were developed throughout the horizontal plane by considering spectral acceleration at one second(Sa_(1.0))as the optimal IM.Results show that the optimal IM ranking is insignificantly influenced by seismic directionality.However,seismic orientation influences fragility,which intensifies in higher damage states,particularly for piers.For a bridge system,the differences in median demand corresponding to the least and most vulnerable direction for slight,moderate,extensive,and collapse states are about 9.0%,7.31%,10.32%,and 11.60%,respectively.These results imply that while evaluating the vulnerability of curved bridges,the optimality of IM in demand estimation and the impact of seismic directionality should not be disregarded.展开更多
文摘The Lenzing Group,a leading supplier of regenerated cellulosic fibers for the textile and nonwovens industries,has unveiled innov ative fabric blends that address one of fashion's most persistent circularity challenges:maintaining premium quality while incorporating significant recycled dontent.Through strategic manufacturing partnerships,Lenzing has successfully demonstrated how its responsibly sourlced and resource-efficiently produced TENCEL Im Lyocell fibers transform the unpredictable quality of mechanically recycled natural fibers into consistent,commercially-viable fabrics.
基金financial support from the Ministry of Education,Culture,Sports,Science and Technology (MEXT),Japan
文摘The effect of seismic directionality is crucial for curved bridges,a subject generally overlooked in seismic vulnerability analysis.This paper focuses on seismic fragility development as a function of seismic incidence directions for a geometrically curved bridge.A series of non-linear time history analyses were carried out for a representative finite element model of the bridge by considering actual ground motions.For reliable seismic demand models,a total of eleven intensity measures(IM)were analyzed based on optimality metrics.To quantify the sensitivity of fragility functions to input incidence directions,fragility surfaces were developed throughout the horizontal plane by considering spectral acceleration at one second(Sa_(1.0))as the optimal IM.Results show that the optimal IM ranking is insignificantly influenced by seismic directionality.However,seismic orientation influences fragility,which intensifies in higher damage states,particularly for piers.For a bridge system,the differences in median demand corresponding to the least and most vulnerable direction for slight,moderate,extensive,and collapse states are about 9.0%,7.31%,10.32%,and 11.60%,respectively.These results imply that while evaluating the vulnerability of curved bridges,the optimality of IM in demand estimation and the impact of seismic directionality should not be disregarded.
