In-situ enlargement of super-large-span tunnels can intensify excavation-induced unloading in the surrounding rock,increasing deformation demand and failure risk during construction.This study combines laboratory mode...In-situ enlargement of super-large-span tunnels can intensify excavation-induced unloading in the surrounding rock,increasing deformation demand and failure risk during construction.This study combines laboratory model tests with FLAC3D simulations to evaluate the stabilizing role of prestressed anchor cables and to establish an energy-balance framework for support optimization.Comparative model tests of existing and enlarged tunnel sections,with and without anchors,show that reinforcement increases load-carrying capacity,reduces displacement,and confines damage to more localized zones.The numerical simulations reproduce displacement fields,shear-strain localization,and plastic-zone evolution with good agreement against the experimental observations.The energy framework is implemented in the in-situ simulations by quantifying unloading-related energy release in the rock mass and reinforcement work contributed by the anchors,and by introducing an energy release–reinforcement ratio as a stability indicator.Parametric analyses indicate that anchor length,spacing,and prestress influence stability in a nonlinear manner,with diminishing returns once reinforcement extends beyond the mechanically dominant deformation zone.An efficient parameter window is identified that improves deformation and yielding control while avoiding unnecessary reinforcement.The results provide an energy-consistent and design-oriented basis for prestressed anchorage selection in large-span tunnel expansion.展开更多
Urban tunnels are often built in multiples,yet the influence of surface structures on their support demands is frequently overlooked,highlighting the need for refined design under realistic loading.This study addresse...Urban tunnels are often built in multiples,yet the influence of surface structures on their support demands is frequently overlooked,highlighting the need for refined design under realistic loading.This study addresses this gap by examining the response of a uniformly loaded strip footing above twin horseshoe tunnels with structural linings.A non-dimensional Footing Stability Improvement Factor(I_(f)),defined as the ratio of ultimate bearing capacity with and without lining to that of a footing on intact rock—is evaluated using adaptive finite element limit analysis.The effects of normalized vertical depth of tunnel,normalised horizontal spacing of tunnel,and lining-thickness factor are examined,providing key insights into foundation-tunnel interaction and support optimization.This study finds that,for unlined twin tunnels,footing-tunnel interaction becomes negligible when embedment exceeds four times of footing widths and tunnel spacing surpasses eleven times of footing widths,beyond which additional support is unnecessary.For lined tunnels,the tunnel-lining thickness required to maintain footing stability equivalent to that on intact rock decreases rapidly with embedment depth.At a tunnel spacing equal to onehalf of the footing width,the critical lining-thickness ratio is about six percent of the footing width at a tunnel depth of half the footing width,reducing to approximately five,four,and three percent at depths of one,one-and-a-half,and two footing widths,and asymptotically approaching nearly one percent for embedment depths exceeding two-and-a-half footing widths.Additionally,rock mass parameters exhibit minimal impact(±2%)on I_(f).The results show that failure mechanisms in footing-tunnel systems are primarily governed by tunnels-positional parmeters,and lining thickness.The study presents a mechanistic framework that delineates the critical depth-spacing-thickness regimes controlling twin-tunnel behavior,providing engineers with clear design boundaries and performance-based lining guidelines to improve the stability of both tunnels and overlying foundations.展开更多
基金funded by the National Key R&D Program of China,China(No.2024YFF0507903)the National Key Research and Development Program of China(Grant No.2024YFF0507904)the National Natural Science Foundation of China,China(Grant No.52379114).
文摘In-situ enlargement of super-large-span tunnels can intensify excavation-induced unloading in the surrounding rock,increasing deformation demand and failure risk during construction.This study combines laboratory model tests with FLAC3D simulations to evaluate the stabilizing role of prestressed anchor cables and to establish an energy-balance framework for support optimization.Comparative model tests of existing and enlarged tunnel sections,with and without anchors,show that reinforcement increases load-carrying capacity,reduces displacement,and confines damage to more localized zones.The numerical simulations reproduce displacement fields,shear-strain localization,and plastic-zone evolution with good agreement against the experimental observations.The energy framework is implemented in the in-situ simulations by quantifying unloading-related energy release in the rock mass and reinforcement work contributed by the anchors,and by introducing an energy release–reinforcement ratio as a stability indicator.Parametric analyses indicate that anchor length,spacing,and prestress influence stability in a nonlinear manner,with diminishing returns once reinforcement extends beyond the mechanically dominant deformation zone.An efficient parameter window is identified that improves deformation and yielding control while avoiding unnecessary reinforcement.The results provide an energy-consistent and design-oriented basis for prestressed anchorage selection in large-span tunnel expansion.
文摘Urban tunnels are often built in multiples,yet the influence of surface structures on their support demands is frequently overlooked,highlighting the need for refined design under realistic loading.This study addresses this gap by examining the response of a uniformly loaded strip footing above twin horseshoe tunnels with structural linings.A non-dimensional Footing Stability Improvement Factor(I_(f)),defined as the ratio of ultimate bearing capacity with and without lining to that of a footing on intact rock—is evaluated using adaptive finite element limit analysis.The effects of normalized vertical depth of tunnel,normalised horizontal spacing of tunnel,and lining-thickness factor are examined,providing key insights into foundation-tunnel interaction and support optimization.This study finds that,for unlined twin tunnels,footing-tunnel interaction becomes negligible when embedment exceeds four times of footing widths and tunnel spacing surpasses eleven times of footing widths,beyond which additional support is unnecessary.For lined tunnels,the tunnel-lining thickness required to maintain footing stability equivalent to that on intact rock decreases rapidly with embedment depth.At a tunnel spacing equal to onehalf of the footing width,the critical lining-thickness ratio is about six percent of the footing width at a tunnel depth of half the footing width,reducing to approximately five,four,and three percent at depths of one,one-and-a-half,and two footing widths,and asymptotically approaching nearly one percent for embedment depths exceeding two-and-a-half footing widths.Additionally,rock mass parameters exhibit minimal impact(±2%)on I_(f).The results show that failure mechanisms in footing-tunnel systems are primarily governed by tunnels-positional parmeters,and lining thickness.The study presents a mechanistic framework that delineates the critical depth-spacing-thickness regimes controlling twin-tunnel behavior,providing engineers with clear design boundaries and performance-based lining guidelines to improve the stability of both tunnels and overlying foundations.
