BACKGROUND Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy(LDP)has emerged as the preferred approach for both benign and malignant lesions located in the pancreatic body and tail.Nevertheless,a notable deficiency persists in the a...BACKGROUND Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy(LDP)has emerged as the preferred approach for both benign and malignant lesions located in the pancreatic body and tail.Nevertheless,a notable deficiency persists in the absence of a standardized,procedure-specific metric for evaluating and comparing surgical quality.A composite measure termed“textbook outcome(TO)”,which encompasses key short-term endpoints,has been validated in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy but has not yet been established in dedicated LDP cohorts.The definition and prediction of TO in this context could aid in facilitating cross-institutional benchmarking and fostering advancements in quality improvement.AIM To establish procedure-specific criteria for TO and identify independent predictors of TO failure in patients undergoing LDP.METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent LDP at a single high-volume pancreatic center between January 2015 and August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.TO was defined as the absence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula(grade B/C),post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage(grade B/C),severe complications(Clavien-Dindo≥III),readmission within 30 days,and in-hospital or 30-day mortality.Multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify independent predictors of TO failure,and a nomogram was constructed and internally validated.RESULTS Among 405 eligible patients,286(70.6%)attained TO.Multivariable analysis revealed that female sex[odds ratio(OR)=0.62,95%confidence interval(CI):0.39-0.99]conferred a protective effect,while preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration(OR=2.66,95%CI:1.05-6.73),pancreatic portal hypertension(OR=2.81,95%CI:1.06-7.45),and cystic-solid(OR=2.51,95%CI:1.34-4.69)or solid lesions(OR=1.91,95%CI:1.06-3.44)were independently associated with TO failure(all P<0.05).The derived nomogram exhibited modest discrimination and calibration when assessed in both the training and validation datasets.CONCLUSION The proposed LDP-specific definition of TO is feasible and discriminative,and the developed nomogram provides an objective tool for individualized risk assessment.展开更多
Diabetes is a widespread disease affecting millions of people,making it one of the leading causes of death in the world.It is a leading cause of cardiovascular disease and end-stage renal disease.Despite advancements ...Diabetes is a widespread disease affecting millions of people,making it one of the leading causes of death in the world.It is a leading cause of cardiovascular disease and end-stage renal disease.Despite advancements in treatment,including insulin therapy and glucose monitoring devices,diabetes continues to significantly impact quality of life and current modalities do not reverse the end-organ damage associated with its progression.While traditionally indicated for type 1 diabetes,recent clinical practice refinements have made pancreas transplants available to select type 2 diabetics meeting specific criteria.These transplants are usually a part of a simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant.However,although less frequently performed,transplants of pancreas alone or pancreas after kidney transplant are still available.For selected diabetic patients,pancreas transplants offer significant survival benefits and the improvement of cardiovascular and metabolic complications;however,they are not without risks.Complications such as bleeding,vascular thrombosis,infection,organ leak,and rejection are possible.Another challenge to pancreas transplantation is the decreasing number of procedures being performed due to decline in the volume of available highquality allografts and resource constraints of transplant centers.Advancements in monitoring and treatment of diabetes are contributing to the decline in pancreas transplants nowadays.展开更多
目的探讨多学科团队(MDT)模式下升阶梯(Step-up)与跨阶梯(Step-jump)策略治疗重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)合并感染性胰腺坏死(IPN)的效果对比。方法回顾性分析2021年1月至2024年6月期间曲靖市第一人民医院收治的57例SAP合并IPN患者的临床资料,...目的探讨多学科团队(MDT)模式下升阶梯(Step-up)与跨阶梯(Step-jump)策略治疗重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)合并感染性胰腺坏死(IPN)的效果对比。方法回顾性分析2021年1月至2024年6月期间曲靖市第一人民医院收治的57例SAP合并IPN患者的临床资料,经MDT评估后分为两组,Step-up组(n=35)采用升阶梯策略治疗,Step-jump组(n=22)采用跨阶梯策略治疗。采用独立样本t检验、Mann-Whitney U和χ^(2)检验比较两组患者手术时间,术中出血量及输血情况,术后抗生素使用时间和引流管拔除时间,住院时间,术后生命体征、实验室检查、影像学检查等指标和并发症发生情况;采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制两组患者的生存曲线。结果57例患者中,3例拒绝手术,54例接受手术治疗,术后48~72 h生命体征均恢复稳定。Step-jump组与Step-up组患者相比,手术时间延长[145.0(104.0,186.0)min vs 97.0(65.0,130.0)min,P=0.041],术中出血量增加[130.0(80.0,180.0)m L vs 60.0(40.0,80.0)m L,P<0.001],差异有统计学意义。两组患者在术后第3天C反应蛋白(CRP)[(127.8±44.9)mg/L vs(118.3±52.9)mg/L]、术后第3天白细胞计数(WBC)[(13.1±3.1)×10^(9)/L vs(12.8±2.6)×10^(9)/L]、抗生素使用时间[(12.5±2.0)d vs(13.2±4.1)d]、总体并发症发生率[12.1%(4/33)vs 14.3%(3/21)]方面比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。两组患者在总住院时间、ICU住院时间、引流管拔除时间、术后生命体征转归时间等方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后影像学随访提示两组患者胰周病变均明显改善。Step-jump组和Step-up组患者术后30 d累积生存率分别为95.5%、94.3%。结论根据MDT评估结果对SAP合并IPN患者选取升阶梯或跨阶梯策略进行治疗,均有较好的临床效果和安全性。展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy(LDP)has emerged as the preferred approach for both benign and malignant lesions located in the pancreatic body and tail.Nevertheless,a notable deficiency persists in the absence of a standardized,procedure-specific metric for evaluating and comparing surgical quality.A composite measure termed“textbook outcome(TO)”,which encompasses key short-term endpoints,has been validated in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy but has not yet been established in dedicated LDP cohorts.The definition and prediction of TO in this context could aid in facilitating cross-institutional benchmarking and fostering advancements in quality improvement.AIM To establish procedure-specific criteria for TO and identify independent predictors of TO failure in patients undergoing LDP.METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent LDP at a single high-volume pancreatic center between January 2015 and August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.TO was defined as the absence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula(grade B/C),post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage(grade B/C),severe complications(Clavien-Dindo≥III),readmission within 30 days,and in-hospital or 30-day mortality.Multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify independent predictors of TO failure,and a nomogram was constructed and internally validated.RESULTS Among 405 eligible patients,286(70.6%)attained TO.Multivariable analysis revealed that female sex[odds ratio(OR)=0.62,95%confidence interval(CI):0.39-0.99]conferred a protective effect,while preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration(OR=2.66,95%CI:1.05-6.73),pancreatic portal hypertension(OR=2.81,95%CI:1.06-7.45),and cystic-solid(OR=2.51,95%CI:1.34-4.69)or solid lesions(OR=1.91,95%CI:1.06-3.44)were independently associated with TO failure(all P<0.05).The derived nomogram exhibited modest discrimination and calibration when assessed in both the training and validation datasets.CONCLUSION The proposed LDP-specific definition of TO is feasible and discriminative,and the developed nomogram provides an objective tool for individualized risk assessment.
文摘Diabetes is a widespread disease affecting millions of people,making it one of the leading causes of death in the world.It is a leading cause of cardiovascular disease and end-stage renal disease.Despite advancements in treatment,including insulin therapy and glucose monitoring devices,diabetes continues to significantly impact quality of life and current modalities do not reverse the end-organ damage associated with its progression.While traditionally indicated for type 1 diabetes,recent clinical practice refinements have made pancreas transplants available to select type 2 diabetics meeting specific criteria.These transplants are usually a part of a simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant.However,although less frequently performed,transplants of pancreas alone or pancreas after kidney transplant are still available.For selected diabetic patients,pancreas transplants offer significant survival benefits and the improvement of cardiovascular and metabolic complications;however,they are not without risks.Complications such as bleeding,vascular thrombosis,infection,organ leak,and rejection are possible.Another challenge to pancreas transplantation is the decreasing number of procedures being performed due to decline in the volume of available highquality allografts and resource constraints of transplant centers.Advancements in monitoring and treatment of diabetes are contributing to the decline in pancreas transplants nowadays.
文摘目的探讨多学科团队(MDT)模式下升阶梯(Step-up)与跨阶梯(Step-jump)策略治疗重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)合并感染性胰腺坏死(IPN)的效果对比。方法回顾性分析2021年1月至2024年6月期间曲靖市第一人民医院收治的57例SAP合并IPN患者的临床资料,经MDT评估后分为两组,Step-up组(n=35)采用升阶梯策略治疗,Step-jump组(n=22)采用跨阶梯策略治疗。采用独立样本t检验、Mann-Whitney U和χ^(2)检验比较两组患者手术时间,术中出血量及输血情况,术后抗生素使用时间和引流管拔除时间,住院时间,术后生命体征、实验室检查、影像学检查等指标和并发症发生情况;采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制两组患者的生存曲线。结果57例患者中,3例拒绝手术,54例接受手术治疗,术后48~72 h生命体征均恢复稳定。Step-jump组与Step-up组患者相比,手术时间延长[145.0(104.0,186.0)min vs 97.0(65.0,130.0)min,P=0.041],术中出血量增加[130.0(80.0,180.0)m L vs 60.0(40.0,80.0)m L,P<0.001],差异有统计学意义。两组患者在术后第3天C反应蛋白(CRP)[(127.8±44.9)mg/L vs(118.3±52.9)mg/L]、术后第3天白细胞计数(WBC)[(13.1±3.1)×10^(9)/L vs(12.8±2.6)×10^(9)/L]、抗生素使用时间[(12.5±2.0)d vs(13.2±4.1)d]、总体并发症发生率[12.1%(4/33)vs 14.3%(3/21)]方面比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。两组患者在总住院时间、ICU住院时间、引流管拔除时间、术后生命体征转归时间等方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后影像学随访提示两组患者胰周病变均明显改善。Step-jump组和Step-up组患者术后30 d累积生存率分别为95.5%、94.3%。结论根据MDT评估结果对SAP合并IPN患者选取升阶梯或跨阶梯策略进行治疗,均有较好的临床效果和安全性。
