目的探讨微创甲状腺手术对甲状腺乳头状癌(papillary thyroid carcinoma,PTC)患者术后甲状旁腺功能恢复的影响,明确恢复时间及其相关影响因素。方法采用队列研究,选取2023年1月至2024年1月在新乡医学院第一附属医院接受手术治疗的110例...目的探讨微创甲状腺手术对甲状腺乳头状癌(papillary thyroid carcinoma,PTC)患者术后甲状旁腺功能恢复的影响,明确恢复时间及其相关影响因素。方法采用队列研究,选取2023年1月至2024年1月在新乡医学院第一附属医院接受手术治疗的110例PTC患者,分为微创手术组(55例)和传统开放手术组(55例)。收集术前甲状腺及甲状旁腺功能指标、术中甲状旁腺保护情况、手术时间、术后血清钙和甲状旁腺激素(parathyroid hormone,PTH)水平、术后恢复时间、低钙血症发生率、住院时间和术后疼痛评分。通过Cox回归模型分析影响恢复的因素,并对两组术后指标进行比较。结果微创手术组的甲状旁腺功能恢复时间显著短于传统组[10(8~12)d vs 17(15~21)d,P<0.001]。术后24和72 h,微创组的血清钙及PTH水平均显著高于传统组(P<0.001),低钙血症发生率明显低于传统组(15.8%vs 32.5%,P=0.005)。Cox回归分析显示,手术方式(HR=0.55,95%CI:0.33~0.91,P=0.021)、甲状旁腺保护(HR=0.58,95%CI:0.35~0.95,P=0.037)、术后早期血清钙(HR=1.32,95%CI:1.10~1.60,P=0.002)及手术时间(HR=1.12,95%CI:1.05~1.20,P=0.001)为独立影响因素。此外,微创组的住院时间(5.2 d vs 7.8 d,P<0.001)和术后疼痛评分(第1 d:2.3 vs 3.7,P<0.001;第3 d:1.5 vs 2.8,P<0.001)均显著低于传统组。结论微创甲状腺手术在甲状腺乳头状癌患者的甲状旁腺功能恢复中具有显著优势,能够缩短恢复时间,减少低钙血症发生率,降低住院时间和术后疼痛。手术方式及甲状旁腺保护是恢复时间的关键因素。展开更多
BACKGROUND Due to the increasing rate of thyroid nodules diagnosis,and the desire to avoid the unsightly cervical scar,remote thyroidectomies were invented and are increasingly performed.Transoral endoscopic thyroidec...BACKGROUND Due to the increasing rate of thyroid nodules diagnosis,and the desire to avoid the unsightly cervical scar,remote thyroidectomies were invented and are increasingly performed.Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach and trans-areolar approaches(TAA)are the two most commonly used remote approaches.No previous meta-analysis has compared postoperative infections and swallowing difficulties among the two procedures.AIM To compared the same among patients undergoing lobectomy for unilateral thyroid carcinoma/benign thyroid nodule.METHODS We searched PubMed MEDLINE,Google Scholar,and Cochrane Library from the date of the first published article up to August 2025.The term used were transoral thyroidectomy vestibular approach,trans areolar thyroidectomy,scarless thyroidectomy,remote thyroidectomy,infections,postoperative,inflammation,dysphagia,and swallowing difficulties.We identified 130 studies,of them,30 full texts were screened and only six studies were included in the final meta-analysis.RESULTS Postoperative infections were not different between the two approaches,odd ratio=1.33,95%confidence interval:0.50-3.53,theχ2 was 1.92 and the P-value for overall effect of 0.57.Similarly,transient swallowing difficulty was not different between the two forms of surgery,with odd ratio=0.91,95%confidence interval:0.35-2.40;theχ2 was 1.32,and the P-value for overall effect of 0.85.CONCLUSION No significant statistical differences were evident between trans-oral endoscopic Mirghani H.Infections and swallowing difficulty in scarless thyroidectomy WJCC https://www.wjgnet.com 2 January 6,2026 Volume 14 Issue 1 thyroidectomy vestibular approach and trans-areolar approach regarding postoperative infection and transient swallowing difficulties.Further longer randomized trials are needed.展开更多
文摘目的探讨微创甲状腺手术对甲状腺乳头状癌(papillary thyroid carcinoma,PTC)患者术后甲状旁腺功能恢复的影响,明确恢复时间及其相关影响因素。方法采用队列研究,选取2023年1月至2024年1月在新乡医学院第一附属医院接受手术治疗的110例PTC患者,分为微创手术组(55例)和传统开放手术组(55例)。收集术前甲状腺及甲状旁腺功能指标、术中甲状旁腺保护情况、手术时间、术后血清钙和甲状旁腺激素(parathyroid hormone,PTH)水平、术后恢复时间、低钙血症发生率、住院时间和术后疼痛评分。通过Cox回归模型分析影响恢复的因素,并对两组术后指标进行比较。结果微创手术组的甲状旁腺功能恢复时间显著短于传统组[10(8~12)d vs 17(15~21)d,P<0.001]。术后24和72 h,微创组的血清钙及PTH水平均显著高于传统组(P<0.001),低钙血症发生率明显低于传统组(15.8%vs 32.5%,P=0.005)。Cox回归分析显示,手术方式(HR=0.55,95%CI:0.33~0.91,P=0.021)、甲状旁腺保护(HR=0.58,95%CI:0.35~0.95,P=0.037)、术后早期血清钙(HR=1.32,95%CI:1.10~1.60,P=0.002)及手术时间(HR=1.12,95%CI:1.05~1.20,P=0.001)为独立影响因素。此外,微创组的住院时间(5.2 d vs 7.8 d,P<0.001)和术后疼痛评分(第1 d:2.3 vs 3.7,P<0.001;第3 d:1.5 vs 2.8,P<0.001)均显著低于传统组。结论微创甲状腺手术在甲状腺乳头状癌患者的甲状旁腺功能恢复中具有显著优势,能够缩短恢复时间,减少低钙血症发生率,降低住院时间和术后疼痛。手术方式及甲状旁腺保护是恢复时间的关键因素。
文摘BACKGROUND Due to the increasing rate of thyroid nodules diagnosis,and the desire to avoid the unsightly cervical scar,remote thyroidectomies were invented and are increasingly performed.Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach and trans-areolar approaches(TAA)are the two most commonly used remote approaches.No previous meta-analysis has compared postoperative infections and swallowing difficulties among the two procedures.AIM To compared the same among patients undergoing lobectomy for unilateral thyroid carcinoma/benign thyroid nodule.METHODS We searched PubMed MEDLINE,Google Scholar,and Cochrane Library from the date of the first published article up to August 2025.The term used were transoral thyroidectomy vestibular approach,trans areolar thyroidectomy,scarless thyroidectomy,remote thyroidectomy,infections,postoperative,inflammation,dysphagia,and swallowing difficulties.We identified 130 studies,of them,30 full texts were screened and only six studies were included in the final meta-analysis.RESULTS Postoperative infections were not different between the two approaches,odd ratio=1.33,95%confidence interval:0.50-3.53,theχ2 was 1.92 and the P-value for overall effect of 0.57.Similarly,transient swallowing difficulty was not different between the two forms of surgery,with odd ratio=0.91,95%confidence interval:0.35-2.40;theχ2 was 1.32,and the P-value for overall effect of 0.85.CONCLUSION No significant statistical differences were evident between trans-oral endoscopic Mirghani H.Infections and swallowing difficulty in scarless thyroidectomy WJCC https://www.wjgnet.com 2 January 6,2026 Volume 14 Issue 1 thyroidectomy vestibular approach and trans-areolar approach regarding postoperative infection and transient swallowing difficulties.Further longer randomized trials are needed.
