为了解中国女子曲棍球比赛的运动负荷特征及运动员在场上的跑动位置和轨迹,应用GPSports Systems SPI 10运动监测系统及Polar团队心率表,对国家女子曲棍球队主力运动员26人备战2008年奥运会期间1～4月24场比赛数据进行整理分析。主要研...为了解中国女子曲棍球比赛的运动负荷特征及运动员在场上的跑动位置和轨迹,应用GPSports Systems SPI 10运动监测系统及Polar团队心率表,对国家女子曲棍球队主力运动员26人备战2008年奥运会期间1～4月24场比赛数据进行整理分析。主要研究表明,我国优秀女曲运动员在场上比赛表现出明显的项目特征:高强度、高对抗,对各个位置运动员的体能要求都很高。由多种不同形式的运动方式穿插在一起组合而成,在场地上约15%的时间是间歇性短距离快跑形式(无氧代谢),约85%的时间是慢跑、走动或原地休息的运动形式(有氧代谢)。快速冲刺能力与国际高水平队存在一定差距。展开更多
目的:探讨16周软式曲棍球干预对中重度智力障碍男生基本动作技能的影响。方法:共招募26名来自特殊学校的中重度智力障碍男生,年龄范围为9~12岁,平均年龄为(11.03±1.48)岁,分为实验组14人和对照组12人,对实验组实施为期16周(每周2...目的:探讨16周软式曲棍球干预对中重度智力障碍男生基本动作技能的影响。方法:共招募26名来自特殊学校的中重度智力障碍男生,年龄范围为9~12岁,平均年龄为(11.03±1.48)岁,分为实验组14人和对照组12人,对实验组实施为期16周(每周2次、每次45 min)的软式曲棍球干预,对照组不实施干预。采用大肌肉动作发展量表(Test of Gross Motor Development-2,TGMD-2)评价被试的基本动作技能。结果:1)采用重复测量方差分析,实验组基本动作技能总分显著高于对照组[F;=16.121,P=0.001],位移技能总分显著高于对照组[F;=12.033,P=0.002],控制技能总分显著高于对照组[F;=15.389,P=0.001];2)在位移技能动作分项中,实验组立定跳远、单脚跳和前滑步动作得分显著提升;3)在控制技能动作分项中,实验组原地拍球、击固定球、双手接球动作得分显著提升。结论:16周软式曲棍球干预提升了中重度智力障碍男生的基本动作技能。展开更多
Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare in-game external load demands from the previous game format(two,30-min halves)to the new format(four,15-min quarters)in collegiate women’s lacrosse.Methods External wo...Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare in-game external load demands from the previous game format(two,30-min halves)to the new format(four,15-min quarters)in collegiate women’s lacrosse.Methods External workload variables(total distance,high-intensity distance[HID],sprints,sprint distance,accelerations,and decelerations)were collected via microtechnology per minute of athlete(n=13)playing time by half(H)for year one(Y1)and by quarter(Q)for year 2(Y2).Results In H1,Y2 registered more distance(Y2:179±37 m/min,Y1:69±45 m/min),HID(Y2:26.4±9.8 m/min,Y1:6.5±5.0 m/min),accelerations(Y2:3.2±0.8 reps/min,Y1:1.4±0.9 reps/min),decelerations(Y2:1.0±0.3 reps/min,Y2:0.4±0.3 reps/min,all P<0.001),sprints(Y2:0.36±0.25 reps/min,Y1:0.07±0.06 reps/min,P=0.006)and sprint distance(Y2:13.2±8.7 m/min,Y1:2.3±2.0 m/min,P=0.004).Y2 was greater in H2 for distance(Y2:175±24 m/min,Y1:109±28 m/min,P<0.001),HID(Y2:21.1±0.6 m/min,Y1:9.9±3.3 m/min,P<0.001),sprints(Y2:0.29±0.19 reps/min,Y1:0.11±0.04 reps/min,P=0.003),accelerations(Y2:2.8±0.6 reps/min,Y1:2.1±0.5 reps/min,P=0.003),decelerations(Y2:0.9±0.2 reps/min,Y1:0.5±0.1 reps/min,P=0.001)and sprint distance(Y2:10.6±6.4 m/min,Y1:3.7±1.4 m/min,P=0.002).Differences in whole game was found for sprints(Y2:0.24±0.3 reps/min,Y1:0.11±0.05 reps/min,P=0.009).Conclusion The new competitive format presented a greater demand for players,with more high-intensity efforts and greater anaerobic demand.Coaches can use this information as key performance indicators to develop and alter training to focus on meeting higher-intensity game demands.展开更多
Purpose This study aimed to describe athlete workload over the course of a four-year collegiate lacrosse career.Methods Workload was evaluated each day of training and games using global positioning system microtechno...Purpose This study aimed to describe athlete workload over the course of a four-year collegiate lacrosse career.Methods Workload was evaluated each day of training and games using global positioning system microtechnology.Total workload for each athlete was calculated for each season of each year for total distance,high-intensity distance,accelerations,decelerations,and sprints.Data were tabulated as absolute and relative workloads with absolute workload representing an individual athlete and relative workload representing that athlete’s percentage of team mean workload.Results The workload of the entire lacrosse team was collected over four years containing the full career of six athletes.Across the five workload variables analyzed,athletes either maintained a workload near team mean workload or demonstrated an increase in workload towards the end of their careers.Conclusion As careers progressed,the variation in athlete workload decreased,and athletes approached the team’s average workload.Microtechnology may be useful in monitoring athlete workload over the course of a career.展开更多
目的:分析中国国家女子曲棍球队队员不同位置的跑动特征,为运动员科学选材与训练提供理论支撑。方法:运用九轴加速度传感器+GPS系统采集曲棍球运动员赛中的运动距离、运动量、运动强度、运动速度以及变速运动等指标。结果:(1)后卫的总...目的:分析中国国家女子曲棍球队队员不同位置的跑动特征,为运动员科学选材与训练提供理论支撑。方法:运用九轴加速度传感器+GPS系统采集曲棍球运动员赛中的运动距离、运动量、运动强度、运动速度以及变速运动等指标。结果:(1)后卫的总跑动距离和训练量显著高于前锋(P<0.001);前卫的训练量、训练强度显著高于前锋(P<0.05 or P<0.01)。(2)在0~4 m/s中低速区间,后卫跑动距离及次数显著高于前锋(P<0.05、P<0.01 or P<0.001);在4~6 m/s中高速区间,运动员在跑动距离、占比及次数方面前卫最高而前锋最低,前卫在4~5m/s区间跑动距离的占比显著高于其他位置(P<0.05 or P<0.01);在6+m/s高速区间,前锋的跑动距离、占比及次数显著高于后卫(P<0.05 or P<0.01)。(3)后卫高速向左、中加速和低加速的次数显著高于前锋(P<0.001 or P<0.01);前卫中速向左、低速向左、中加速、中减速以及低速向右的次数显著高于前锋(P<0.01 or P<0.05)。结论:中国国家女子曲棍球队前锋、前卫和后卫分别具有较强的高速、中速和中低速奔跑能力,分别体现了较多的高速直线加速、中低变速、中高变速运动的特征,前、后卫左向旋转变速运动表现尤为突出。展开更多
文摘为了解中国女子曲棍球比赛的运动负荷特征及运动员在场上的跑动位置和轨迹,应用GPSports Systems SPI 10运动监测系统及Polar团队心率表,对国家女子曲棍球队主力运动员26人备战2008年奥运会期间1～4月24场比赛数据进行整理分析。主要研究表明,我国优秀女曲运动员在场上比赛表现出明显的项目特征:高强度、高对抗,对各个位置运动员的体能要求都很高。由多种不同形式的运动方式穿插在一起组合而成,在场地上约15%的时间是间歇性短距离快跑形式(无氧代谢),约85%的时间是慢跑、走动或原地休息的运动形式(有氧代谢)。快速冲刺能力与国际高水平队存在一定差距。
文摘目的:探讨16周软式曲棍球干预对中重度智力障碍男生基本动作技能的影响。方法:共招募26名来自特殊学校的中重度智力障碍男生,年龄范围为9~12岁,平均年龄为(11.03±1.48)岁,分为实验组14人和对照组12人,对实验组实施为期16周(每周2次、每次45 min)的软式曲棍球干预,对照组不实施干预。采用大肌肉动作发展量表(Test of Gross Motor Development-2,TGMD-2)评价被试的基本动作技能。结果:1)采用重复测量方差分析,实验组基本动作技能总分显著高于对照组[F;=16.121,P=0.001],位移技能总分显著高于对照组[F;=12.033,P=0.002],控制技能总分显著高于对照组[F;=15.389,P=0.001];2)在位移技能动作分项中,实验组立定跳远、单脚跳和前滑步动作得分显著提升;3)在控制技能动作分项中,实验组原地拍球、击固定球、双手接球动作得分显著提升。结论:16周软式曲棍球干预提升了中重度智力障碍男生的基本动作技能。
文摘Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare in-game external load demands from the previous game format(two,30-min halves)to the new format(four,15-min quarters)in collegiate women’s lacrosse.Methods External workload variables(total distance,high-intensity distance[HID],sprints,sprint distance,accelerations,and decelerations)were collected via microtechnology per minute of athlete(n=13)playing time by half(H)for year one(Y1)and by quarter(Q)for year 2(Y2).Results In H1,Y2 registered more distance(Y2:179±37 m/min,Y1:69±45 m/min),HID(Y2:26.4±9.8 m/min,Y1:6.5±5.0 m/min),accelerations(Y2:3.2±0.8 reps/min,Y1:1.4±0.9 reps/min),decelerations(Y2:1.0±0.3 reps/min,Y2:0.4±0.3 reps/min,all P<0.001),sprints(Y2:0.36±0.25 reps/min,Y1:0.07±0.06 reps/min,P=0.006)and sprint distance(Y2:13.2±8.7 m/min,Y1:2.3±2.0 m/min,P=0.004).Y2 was greater in H2 for distance(Y2:175±24 m/min,Y1:109±28 m/min,P<0.001),HID(Y2:21.1±0.6 m/min,Y1:9.9±3.3 m/min,P<0.001),sprints(Y2:0.29±0.19 reps/min,Y1:0.11±0.04 reps/min,P=0.003),accelerations(Y2:2.8±0.6 reps/min,Y1:2.1±0.5 reps/min,P=0.003),decelerations(Y2:0.9±0.2 reps/min,Y1:0.5±0.1 reps/min,P=0.001)and sprint distance(Y2:10.6±6.4 m/min,Y1:3.7±1.4 m/min,P=0.002).Differences in whole game was found for sprints(Y2:0.24±0.3 reps/min,Y1:0.11±0.05 reps/min,P=0.009).Conclusion The new competitive format presented a greater demand for players,with more high-intensity efforts and greater anaerobic demand.Coaches can use this information as key performance indicators to develop and alter training to focus on meeting higher-intensity game demands.
文摘Purpose This study aimed to describe athlete workload over the course of a four-year collegiate lacrosse career.Methods Workload was evaluated each day of training and games using global positioning system microtechnology.Total workload for each athlete was calculated for each season of each year for total distance,high-intensity distance,accelerations,decelerations,and sprints.Data were tabulated as absolute and relative workloads with absolute workload representing an individual athlete and relative workload representing that athlete’s percentage of team mean workload.Results The workload of the entire lacrosse team was collected over four years containing the full career of six athletes.Across the five workload variables analyzed,athletes either maintained a workload near team mean workload or demonstrated an increase in workload towards the end of their careers.Conclusion As careers progressed,the variation in athlete workload decreased,and athletes approached the team’s average workload.Microtechnology may be useful in monitoring athlete workload over the course of a career.
文摘目的:分析中国国家女子曲棍球队队员不同位置的跑动特征,为运动员科学选材与训练提供理论支撑。方法:运用九轴加速度传感器+GPS系统采集曲棍球运动员赛中的运动距离、运动量、运动强度、运动速度以及变速运动等指标。结果:(1)后卫的总跑动距离和训练量显著高于前锋(P<0.001);前卫的训练量、训练强度显著高于前锋(P<0.05 or P<0.01)。(2)在0~4 m/s中低速区间,后卫跑动距离及次数显著高于前锋(P<0.05、P<0.01 or P<0.001);在4~6 m/s中高速区间,运动员在跑动距离、占比及次数方面前卫最高而前锋最低,前卫在4~5m/s区间跑动距离的占比显著高于其他位置(P<0.05 or P<0.01);在6+m/s高速区间,前锋的跑动距离、占比及次数显著高于后卫(P<0.05 or P<0.01)。(3)后卫高速向左、中加速和低加速的次数显著高于前锋(P<0.001 or P<0.01);前卫中速向左、低速向左、中加速、中减速以及低速向右的次数显著高于前锋(P<0.01 or P<0.05)。结论:中国国家女子曲棍球队前锋、前卫和后卫分别具有较强的高速、中速和中低速奔跑能力,分别体现了较多的高速直线加速、中低变速、中高变速运动的特征,前、后卫左向旋转变速运动表现尤为突出。
