The original intention of the algorithmic recommender system is to grapple with the negative impacts caused by information overload,but the system also can be used as"hypernudge",a new form of online manipul...The original intention of the algorithmic recommender system is to grapple with the negative impacts caused by information overload,but the system also can be used as"hypernudge",a new form of online manipulation,to inten⁃tionally exploit people's cognitive and decision-making gaps to influence their decisions in practice,which is particu⁃larly detrimental to the sustainable development of the digital market.Limiting harmful algorithmic online manipula⁃tion in digital markets has become a challenging task.Globally,both the EU and China have responded to this issue,and the differences between them are so evident that their governance measures can serve as the typical case.The EU focuses on improving citizens'digital literacy and their ability to integrate into digital social life to independently ad⁃dress this issue,and expects to address harmful manipulation behavior through binding and applicable hard law,which is part of the digital strategy.By comparison,although there exist certain legal norms that have made relevant stipula⁃tions on manipulation issues,China continues to issue specific departmental regulations to regulate algorithmic recom⁃mender services,and pays more attention to addressing collective harm caused by algorithmic online manipulation through a multiple co-governance approach led by the government or industry associations to implement supervision.展开更多
文摘The original intention of the algorithmic recommender system is to grapple with the negative impacts caused by information overload,but the system also can be used as"hypernudge",a new form of online manipulation,to inten⁃tionally exploit people's cognitive and decision-making gaps to influence their decisions in practice,which is particu⁃larly detrimental to the sustainable development of the digital market.Limiting harmful algorithmic online manipula⁃tion in digital markets has become a challenging task.Globally,both the EU and China have responded to this issue,and the differences between them are so evident that their governance measures can serve as the typical case.The EU focuses on improving citizens'digital literacy and their ability to integrate into digital social life to independently ad⁃dress this issue,and expects to address harmful manipulation behavior through binding and applicable hard law,which is part of the digital strategy.By comparison,although there exist certain legal norms that have made relevant stipula⁃tions on manipulation issues,China continues to issue specific departmental regulations to regulate algorithmic recom⁃mender services,and pays more attention to addressing collective harm caused by algorithmic online manipulation through a multiple co-governance approach led by the government or industry associations to implement supervision.
