期刊文献+

不同常压流化床煤气化方案的模型预测 Ⅱ.模型预测及分析 被引量:6

KINETIC MODEL PREDICTION FOR VARIOUS COAL GASIFICATION SCHEMES IN A FLUIDIZED BED Ⅱ. MODEL PREDICTION AND ANALYSIS
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用已建立的流化床煤气化模型系统地研究了不同气化方案下的流化床煤气化性能,包括空气气化、空气 蒸气气化、空气 二氧化碳气化、氧气 水蒸气气化、氧气 二氧化碳气化5个气化方案,结果表明:空气 水蒸气和氧气 水蒸气方案具有较优的气化效率和较高的煤气品质,氧气 蒸气气化方案在煤气组分、气化效率和热效率等方面比空气 蒸气气化方案更具优势。 A series of calculations were carried out to explore the effects of various gasification schemes on the performance of fluidized bed coal gasification using the mathematical model previously established by the authors. The gasification performances for five schemes including air, air/H_2O, air/CO_2, O_2/H_2O and O_2/CO_2 blown were studied. The main results show that the better gasification efficiency and higher syngas quality can be obtained from the schemes of air/H_2O and O_2/H_2O. Furthermore, the O_2/H_2O scheme are more predominant than air/H_2O scheme in syngas composition, gasification efficiency and thermal efficiency.
出处 《燃料化学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第3期292-296,共5页 Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology
基金 国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(G1999022105)~~
关键词 煤气化 流化床 气化模型 模型预测 coal gasification fluidized bed gasification model model prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1[2]Watkinson A P, Lucas J P, Lim C J. A prediction of performance of commercial coal gasifiers[J]. Fuel, 1991, 70(4): 519-527.
  • 2[3]Kovacik G, Oguztoreli M, Chambers A, et al. Equilibrium calculations in coal gasification[J]. Hydrogen Energy, 1990, 15(2): 125-131.
  • 3[4]Yan H M, Craig Heidenreich, Zhang D K. Mathematical modeling of a bubbling fluidized-bed coal gasifier and the significance of 'net flow'[J]. Fuel, 1998, 77(10): 1067-1079.
  • 4[5]Hamel Stefan, Krumm Wolfgang. Mathematical modeling and simulation of bubbling fluidized bed gasifiers[J]. Pow Tech, 2001, 120(1-2): 105-112.

同被引文献42

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部