期刊文献+

从学生网上评价教师课堂教学质量调查分析大学英语教学和教材 被引量:19

Evaluating the quality of CE-teaching and textbooks from campus-web-based students’ assessments
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究依托西南交通大学以学生为主体的教学质量校园网络评价体系,对全校三个年级所有修读大学英语的8701名本科生(取样率为100%)网上评价大学英语课堂教学和教材的数据进行了定量统计分析,对其中某些结果又辅以同行专家评价的定性考察以分析其吻合程度。本调查旨在探讨该评价体系是否能客观地评估和显化大学英语教学质量,探索如何利用评价结果反馈教学研究,从教学主体——学生的角度审视大学英语教学质量和教材,为开展有针对性、有实效的教研活动和师资培训提供参考,同时为高等院校大学英语教学质量评估提供实证性依据。 With the help of the campus-web system for the evaluation of university teaching given by students in SWJTU, the study collected data from all the 8701undergraduates who are taking college English (CE) as their credit course, and investigated quantitatively the students' assessments about CE teaching and the textbooks used. Certain results were further examined in a qualitative way to look at to what extent students' evaluation results agree with those obtained by professionals. From a student-centered perspective, the study probed the objectivity of the evaluation system, looked into how it could clear the quality of CE teaching and how the evaluation feedback could help better CE teaching quality and textbook selection. We hope this study could provide reference to effective and to-the-point teaching research and teacher training and offer empirical evidence to the study of CE teaching quality evaluation in colleges and universities.
出处 《外语界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第3期18-25,共8页 Foreign Language World
基金 四川省教育厅社会科学研究项目成果之一 (项目号 :SA0 2 - 118) 西南交通大学的资助
关键词 评价体系 大学英语 教学质量 教材 evaluation system college English quality of teaching textbook
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Feldman K A. Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, and external (neutral) observers [ J ]. Research in Higher Education, 1989, (30):113-135.
  • 2Johson V E. An A Is an A Is an A [N]. New York Times, 2002-04-12.
  • 3Marsh H W. Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility [J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984, (76) :707 -754.
  • 4Marsh H W & M J Dunkin. Students' evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective[ A].In R P Perry & J C Smart (eds.) Effective Teaching in Higher Education [C]. New York: Agathon, 1997.
  • 5MeKeaehie W J. Student ratings [ J]. American Psychologist, 1997, (52) :1209 - 1217.
  • 6Waters G A. Critical evaluation for education reform [J]. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 1998, (6).
  • 7陈善飞.高等教育大众化的教师教学质量评价[J].中国高等教育评估,2003,16(2):53-55. 被引量:1
  • 8胡祖莹,魏红.教学评价中信息来源的可靠性研究[J].教师教育研究,1996,11(3):38-43. 被引量:25
  • 9蓝江桥,冷余生,李小平,余敏,舒重胜,石绍应.中美两国大学课程教学质量评价的比较与思考[J].高等教育研究,2003,24(2):96-100. 被引量:136
  • 10龙志和 李军 杨宁 桂富强 李海波.高校课堂教学质量评价理论与应用研究总结报告[A].阎开印.教改信息[C].成都:西南交通大学教务处,2001(3).4-21.

二级参考文献31

  • 1胡祖莹,魏红.教学评价中信息来源的可靠性研究[J].教师教育研究,1996,11(3):38-43. 被引量:25
  • 2张华 石伟平 等.课程流派研究[M].山东教育出版社,2001.530-534.
  • 3Feldman, K. A. Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, and extenud (neutral) observers[J]. Research in Higher Education, 1989,(30):113-135.
  • 4Marsh, H.W. Students' evaluations of university teaching:Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility[ J ]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984, ( 76 ) :707-754.
  • 5Brandenburg, D. C., Slindle, J. A and Batista, E. E.Student ratings of instruction: Validity and normative interpretations[J]. Research in Higher Education, 1977,(7):67-78.
  • 6Centra, J. A. Reflective Faculty Evaluation[M]. Jossey-Bass Publishers. 1993.
  • 7Marsh, H. W., & Dunkin, M. J. Students' evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In R.P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.) Effective Teaching in Higher Education[ M]. New York: Agathon. 1997.241-320.
  • 8Feldman, K. A. Classsize and students' evaluations of college teacher and courses: A close look [ J ]. Research in Higher Education, 1984, (21) :45-116.
  • 9McKeachie, W. J. Student ratings[J]. American Psychologist, 1997,(52) :1218-1225.
  • 10Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings[J]. American Psychologist, 1997, (52) : 1209-1217.

共引文献570

同被引文献143

引证文献19

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部