期刊文献+

乔姆斯基语言天赋思想的皮尔士哲学根源:溯因逻辑 被引量:31

On the Peircean philosophical foundations in Chomskyan innateness hypothesis: logic of abduction
原文传递
导出
摘要 乔姆斯基 (Chomsky)的语言学思想 ,特别是他的语言天赋观 ,到底来源于哪些前辈哲学家 ?本文在大量证据的基础上 ,论证乔姆斯基语言天赋论的哲学基础主要来源于皮尔士 (Peirce) ,乔姆斯基语言习得理论的哲学背景是皮尔士一般知识获得体系。本文首先探讨了皮尔士的一般知识获得理论 ,认为乔姆斯基的语言习得天赋思想借鉴了皮尔士认识论的两个重要思想 :猜测本能和溯因逻辑。最后本文在Andersen (1973)语言习得模型的基础上 ,解释了后期皮尔士溯因逻辑在乔姆斯基语言习得理论中的作用 ,并且试图在乔姆斯基语言习得模型中融合皮尔士的认识论(溯因逻辑 )思想 :在猜测本能基础上的溯因 -演绎 -归纳的知识获得过程 ,即儿童从有限素材基础上本能地利用溯因推理建立假设和理论 ,创造性地演绎生成新语言事实 ,再由归纳在经验中检验这些新语言事实 。 This paper argues that the philosophical foundations of Chomsky's innateness hypothesis in language acquisition is mainly derived from Peirce's general knowledge acquisition, and that Chomsky borrowed two important ideas from Peirce to develop his innateness: guessing instinct and abduction. This paper first presents Peirce's knowledge acquisition theory and shows how Chomsky feels closest to him in epistemology. In the end, based on Andersen (1973), this paper illustrates the role of the later Peircean abduction in Chomsky's theory of language acquisition and tries to integrate the logic of abduction into Chomsky' language acquisition model. The conclusion is that a child acquires his mother language by abducing a hypothetical grammar based on his interaction with experience followed by deducing new linguistic data from such hypothetical grammar and inducing them in real context.
作者 贺川生
出处 《当代语言学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第2期128-138,共11页 Contemporary Linguistics
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目 0 2BYY0 0 1形式语言学研究的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Aliseda-Llera, A. 1997. Seeking Explanations: Abduction in Logic, Philosophy of Science and Artificial Intelligence. Ph.D. diss., Stanford University. ILLC Dissertation Series.
  • 2Anderson, D.R. 1987. Creativity and the Philosophy of C S. Peirce. Dordrecht: Marfinus Nijhoff.Andersen, H. 1973. Abductive and deductive change. Language 49:567-95.
  • 3Brent, J. 1998. Charles Sanders Peirce: A Life. Bloomington, I.N. : Indiana University Press.
  • 4Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.
  • 5Chomsky, N. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics. New York: Harper and Row.
  • 6Chomsky, N. 1968. Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • 7Chomsky, N. 1969. Linguistics and philosophy. In Sidney Hook, ed. , Language and Philosophy. NY: NY University Press.
  • 8Chomsky, N. 1975. Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon.
  • 9Chomsky, N. 1977. Language and Responsibility. New York: Pantheon.
  • 10Chomsky, N. 1980a. On cogntive structures and their development: a reply to Piaget. In M. Piatelli-Palmerini,ed. , Language and Learning. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press. 35- 52.

二级参考文献36

  • 1威廉·涅尔 玛莎·涅尔.逻辑学的发展[M].北京:商务印书馆,1985.624.
  • 2库克.现代数学史[M].呼和浩特:内蒙古人民出版社,1982.61.
  • 3罗素.西方的智慧[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999.276.
  • 4Aliseda-Llera, Atocha. Seeking Explanations:Abduction in Logic, Philosophy of Science andArtificial Intelligence [D]. Ph.D. dissertation,Stanford University. ILLC Dissertation Series,1997-4.
  • 5Austin,John. How to Do Things with Words [M].Oxford University Press, 1962.
  • 6Bach, Kent. The semantics-pragmatics distinction:what it is and why it matters [J/A]. LinguistischeBerichte 8, Special Issue on Pragmatics,1997,33-50.
  • 7Also in Ken Turner. The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points ofView [C]. Oxford: Elsevier Science, 1999, 65-84.
  • 8Fox, Richard Keith. Layered Abduction forSpeech Recognition from Articulation: ARTREC[D]. Ph.D. dissertation. The Ohio StateUniversity,1992.
  • 9Gabbay, Dov. Abduction in labelled deductivesystems-a conceptual abstract [A]. R. Kruseand E Siegel. Symbolic and QuantitativeApproaches to Uncertainty [C]. Springer-Vedag,1991.
  • 10Gabbay, Dov. Labelled Deductive Systems [M].Vol. 1. Oxford University Press,1994.

共引文献141

同被引文献440

引证文献31

二级引证文献118

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部