摘要
举证责任倒置是举证责任分配的一个重要内容 ,2 0 0 1年 1 2月最高人民法院《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》(以下简称《规定》)第 4条也被认为是关于举证责任倒置的较为完善的条款 ,但对于什么是举证责任倒置 ,举证责任倒置与举证责任转移有何区分 ,《规定》第 4条作为规定举证责任倒置的条款是否还有缺陷等问题 ,学界似乎少有关注 。
The inversion of burden of proof is an important subject of the allocation of burden of proof. Article 4 of the Several Rules on Civil Litigation Evidence (hereinafter Rules) made by the Supreme People's Court in Dec. 2001 is also been viewed as a quite perfect clause about the inversion of burden of proof. However, attention of the academic field has seldom been paid to the following questions: the definition of inversion of burden of proof; the differences between inversion of burden of proof and transfer of burden of proof; the limitation of Article 4 as a clause of inversion of burden of proof, etc. Many are pending questions.
出处
《政法论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第3期69-76,共8页
Tribune of Political Science and Law
