联合外汇干预的实证研究被引量：8

Empirical Assessment on the Effectiveness of Joint Intervention in the Foreign Exchange Market

导出

摘要本文采用干预分析模型来考察日、美两国央行对日元美元汇率进行的联合干预的效果 ,以得到外汇干预是否对汇率产生影响以及该影响能否持久的结论。研究结果表明 ,1 998年 6月 1 7日 ,美、日联合外汇干预对日元美元汇率产生了一定的影响 ,但联合干预与非联合干预在效果上没有重大差别 ,其影响很短暂。因此 ,汇率变动的最终决定性因素 ,不是外汇干预 ,而是货币所在国国内经济。 This paper is an attempt to assess the effectiveness and the its duration of joint intervention on the exchange rate by utilizing the intervention analysis model and employing the spot rates between US and Japanese currencies from August 15, 1996 to January 6, 1999 from Reuters. The conclusion is that there is no significant difference between the effectiveness of joint intervention and independent intervention. In addition the intervention has significant impact on the exchange rate, but has only short-term impact on the exchange rates.

作者陈浪南黄洵

机构地区中山大学经济研究所中山大学岭南学院

出处《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第5期58-66,共9页 Economic Research Journal

基金 AFDP (2 0 0 3)研究课题和教育部社科十五课题成果之一

关键词干预分析模型美国日本中央银行日元美元国际资本流动外汇汇率联合外汇干预 Intervention Analysis Exchange Rates Effectiveness

分类号 F224 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献24

1Box, G E P and Tiao, G C , 1975, Intervention Analysis With Applications To Economic and Environmental Problems, Journal of American Statistical Association, March 1975,Vol.70.
2Cukierman Alex,1986, Central Bank Behavior and Credibility: Some Recent Theoretical Developments, Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review 68.
3Danker, D J , Hass, R A , Henderson, D W , Symansky, S A and Tryon, R W ,1987, Small Empirical Models of Exchange Market Intervention, Journal of Policy Modeling 9, 143-173.
4Dominguez, k, 1990, Market Reponses To Coordinated Central Bank Intervention, Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 32,121-164.
5Domingnez, K, 1992,The Informational Role of Official Foreign Exchange Intervention Operations: The Signalling Hypothesis, in: Domingnez,K , Exchange Rate Efficiency and the Behavior of International Asset Markets, chapter 2, Garland Publishing Compnay, N Y , pp. 41-80.
6Domingnez, k and Frankel, J A , 1993, Foreign Exchange Intervention: An Empirical Assessment, in Jeffrey A Frankel, ed , On Exchange Rates, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,1993.
7Edison, H T , 1993, The Effectiveness of Central Bank Intervention: A Survey of Literature After 1982, Special Papers in International Economics, Pnnceton University, New Jersey.
8Eijffinger,S C W and Gruijters, N , 1992, On the Effectiveness of Daily Intervention by the Deutsche Bundesbank and the Federal Reserve System in the U. S. Dollar-Deutsche Mark Exchange Market, in: E Baltensperger and H -W Sinn ( Hrsg. ), Exchange-rate regimes and currency unions. MacMillan Press London, 131- 156.
9Engel, C M and A P Rodrigues, 1989, "Tests of International CAPM with Time-Varying Covariances", Journal of Applied Econometrics,4,119-138.
10Frankel, J A, 1982, In Search of the Exchange Risk Premium: A six currency test assuming Mean-Variance Optimisation, Journal of International Money and Finance, 1,255-274.