期刊文献+

发输电组合系统可靠性评估中的最优负荷削减模型分析 被引量:58

ANALYSIS ON OPTIMAL LOAD SHEDDING MODEL IN RELIABILITY EVALUATION OF COMPOSITE GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 介绍了基于直流潮流的负荷削减线性规划模型和基于交流潮流的负荷削减非线性规划模型的基本原理,对它们各自的优缺点进行了分析,并使用它们对RBTS(RoyBillinton Test system)可靠性测试系统进行了评估。计算结果表明,直流潮流的负荷削减线性规划模型由于忽略了节点电压约束的影响,存在较大的模型误差,要得到精确的可靠性指标,应该使用基于交流潮流的负荷削减非线性规划模型。 There are three basic aspects in the reliability evaluation algorithm of composite generation and transmission system, they are system state selection, system state analysis and updating of reliability index. The system state analysis contains power flow calculation and optimal amount of load shedding, the latter is the core of reliability evaluation which can determine whether the system is faulty and the amount of optimal load shedding that is necessary to restore system to secure state, so different load shedding model leads to different reliability evaluation result Here, the basic principle of linear programming model of load shedding based on DC power flow and that of nonlinear programming model of load shedding based on AC power flow are presented, the merits and demerits of the two models are analyzed, and the Roy Billington Test System (RBTS) is evaluated by the two models. The calculation results show that because of the constraints of node voltages are neglected there is comparatively large model error in the linear programming model based on DC power flow, therefore if the accurate reliability indices are wanted the AC power flow based nonlinear programming model of load shedding should be adopted.
出处 《电网技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2004年第10期34-37,共4页 Power System Technology
关键词 电力系统 可靠性评估 发输电组合系统 最优负荷削减模型 线性规划 Algorithms Electric lines Electric network analyzers Electric power generation HVDC power transmission Linear programming Mathematical models Nonlinear programming Reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Melo A C G, Pereira M V F, Leite da Silva A M. A conditional probability approach to the calculation of frequency and duration indices in composite reliability evaluation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1993, 8(3): 1118-1125.
  • 2Pereira M V F, Pintoad L M V G. A new computational tool for composite reliability evaluation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Sytems, 1992, 7(1): 258-264.
  • 3Billinton R, Wenyuan L. Hybrid approach for reliability evaluation of composite generation and transmission systems using Monte-Carlo simulation and enumeration technique[J]. IEE Proceedings-C, 1991,138(3): 233-241.
  • 4Billinton R, Wenyuan Li. Reliability assessment of electrical power systems using monte carlo methods[M]. New York: Plenue Press,1994.
  • 5Salvaderi L, Billinton R. A comparison between two fundamentally different approaches to composite system reliability evaluation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1985, 104(12):3486-3491.
  • 6Granville S, Mello J C O, Mello A C G. Application of interior point methods to power flow unsolvability[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1996, 11(2): 1096-1103.
  • 7Sakis A P, Feng Xia. Optimal power flow application to composite power system reliability analysis[C]. Athens Power Tech, 1993. APT 93. Proceedings. Joint International Power Conference, 1993, 185-190.
  • 8Billinton R, Kumar S, Chowdhury N et al. A reliability test system for educational purposes-basic data[J]. IEEE Trans on Power Systems,1989, 4(3): 1238-1244.

共引文献1

同被引文献551

引证文献58

二级引证文献637

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部