期刊文献+

从历史发展多线性到史学范式多样化——围绕“以一元多线论为基础的现代化范式”的讨论 被引量:26

The Modernization Paradigm Based on Monistic Multi-linear Theory:A Response to Some pro and con Comments
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 “以一元多线论为基础的现代化范式”把“现代化”主要看做一个有特定内涵的全球历史大变革进程 ,看做一个并不具备终极目标价值而且道路模式选择多样的历史范畴 ,从而使之成为史学研究的对象。它和 2 0世纪 5 0~ 6 0年代的美国现代化论有原则上的不同 ,也不同于建立在“五种生产方式序列”基础上的“革命范式”。东、西方两种对立的单线演进历史模式 ,在史学方法论上都有绝对主义和排他性色彩。一元多线历史发展观则是开放的、包容的、多面向的。现代化范式的出现打破了史学长期由单一范式支配的局面。史学范式的多样化 ,是中国史学繁荣之道。 For a long period prior to 1979,Chinese historical research has been dominated by the theory of 'the Five Modes of Production'.According to this theory,the whole history of China as well as the other parts of the world has been developed from the first MOD to the last one,succeeds one by one.The modernization theories prevailed during 1950s~1960s gave another uni-linear model of historical changes.For example,W.W.Rostow designed a Five Stage rank as a universal framework of economic development,every society could find its position in this uni-line.The task of the less developed societies is just accepting modernity from the modernized-developed societies to make advance in the rank.Thus modernization is a uni-direction movement as well as a uni-linear process.After 1979,modernization as a new paradigm has been accepted by an increasing number of Chinese historians.The increasing depth and breadth of academic research has encouraged such an acceptance,but,admittedly,as a new conceptual system that corresponded to the historic break and the new direction towards modernization in China,this acceptance also showed the 'crisis of paradigm',that is,the contradiction between the new theme and the old ones that had dominated Chinese humanities and social sciences.The Modernization Paradigm based on monistic multi-linear theory considers modernization as a unique breakthrough of history,a great transformation around the whole world,and a historical process without a given ultimate aim and value but with different models and routes.It has an open,embracing sense of different schools in historical studies.A variety of historical paradigm is favorable to the flourish of Chinese historiography.
作者 董正华
出处 《史学月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第5期5-20,共16页 Journal of Historical Science
关键词 一元多线论 现代化 现代化范式 史学范式 monistic multi-linear theory modernization modernization paradigm historical paradigm
  • 相关文献

参考文献57

  • 1德里克.革命后的史学:中国近代史研究中的当代危机[J].中国社会科学辑刊,1995,.
  • 2冯钢.关于中国近代史研究的"现代化范式"[J].天津社会科学,2000,(5).
  • 3余敦康.我也介绍一篇文章[J].东方,1994,(6).
  • 4.恩格斯致约·布洛赫(1890年9月21~22日)[A]..马克思恩格斯选集:第4卷[C].北京:人民出版社,1995..
  • 5吴英.关于现代化的含义、规律和模式——对《现代化新论》几个理论观点的评析[J].天津师范大学学报(社会科学版),2001,21(5):1-8. 被引量:12
  • 6尼尔·弗格森 丁进译.未曾发生的历史[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2001..
  • 7巴勒克拉夫 张广勇.当代史导论[M],张宇宏译[M].上海社会科学出版社,1996..
  • 8.马克思恩格斯选集:第4卷[C].北京:人民出版社,1972..
  • 9埃里克·霍布斯鲍姆 马俊亚.史学家--历史神话的终结者[M],郭英剑译[M].上海人民出版社,2002..
  • 10闻一多.文学的历史动向(1943).转引自余英时.轴心突破和礼乐传统[J].二十一世纪(香港),2000,(58).

共引文献524

同被引文献532

引证文献26

二级引证文献183

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部