期刊文献+

龙江路、辽宁路元皮的质量差异 被引量:6

The Difference of Fur Quality between Heilongjiang Weasel and Liaoning Weasel
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 裘皮行业在收购及出口配货过程中 ,一直按照国家规定的收购规格和出口配货规格采用传统的感官验质方法 ,并没有对皮张的具体数量指标加以比较。文中通过对 6 0张龙江路、辽宁路元皮的皮张质量、皮板厚度、毛长度、毛细度、毛密度等影响皮张质量的指标进行测量、比较分析 ,在数量指标上验证了裘皮行业对两种元皮检验的质量区别 ,并从生态学角度分析了造成两种元皮质量差异的原因。 A traditional sense checking method is used all the time in fur purchase and export in the fur industry, and the fur specification is according to the national fur standard. However, the quantitative indexes of furs are not detailed in this method. The quantitative indexes of sixty weasel furs that came from Heilongjiang and Liaoning were measured and analyzed, including fur weight, fur thickness, hair length, hair thin and hair density which all affect fur quality. With the above quantitative indexes, the quality difference between the two different weasel furs was identified, and the reason causing the quality difference was also analyzed from the point of view of ecology.
作者 周宏力
机构地区 东北林业大学
出处 《东北林业大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第3期55-58,共4页 Journal of Northeast Forestry University
关键词 黄鼬 龙江路元皮 辽宁路元皮 质量差异 Weasel Heilongjiang weasel Liaoning weasel Quality difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1盛和林.黄鼬体型大小特性二型及地理变异[J].兽类学报,1987,(2):92-96.
  • 2景松岩.毛皮学[M].哈尔滨:东北林业大学出版社,1989..
  • 3盛和林.黄鼬冬季食性的研究[J].华东师范大学学报,1964,(2):117-122.
  • 4肖增祜.辽宁动物志(兽纲)[M].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1988..
  • 5朱靖 王家义.黄鼬的换毛序[J].动物学杂志,1960,(7):293-295.
  • 6金煜,张梦利,李少白,刘晓燕,杨凯智,杨光,杨可兴.黄鼬东北亚种山皮甸皮差异原因分析[J].野生动物,1996,17(3):15-17. 被引量:2

共引文献4

同被引文献34

引证文献6

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部