期刊文献+

Laparoscopic versus conventional open resection of rectal carcinoma:A clinical comparative study 被引量:30

Laparoscopic versus conventional open resection of rectal carcinoma:A clinical comparative study
暂未订购
导出
摘要 AIM:To evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic resection of rectal carcinoma and to compare the short-term outcome of laparoscopic procedure with conventional open surgery for rectal cancer. METHODS:Thirty-eight patients with rectal cancer were included in a prospective non-randomized study.The patients were assigned to laparoscopic (n=18) or open (n=18) colorectal resection.Case selection,surgical technique,and clinical and pathological results were reviewed. RESULTS:The operative time was longer in laparoscopic resection group (LAP) than in open resection group (189±18 min vs 146±22 min,P7<0.05).Intraoperative blood Loss and postoperative complications were less in LAP resection group than in open resection group.An earlier return of bowel motility was observed after laparoscopic surgery.The overall postoperative morbidity was 5.6% in the LAP resection group and 27.8% in open resection group (P<0.05).No anastomotic leakage was found in both groups. The pathologic examination showed that the length of the resected specimen,the mean number of harvested lymph nodes in laparoscopic resection group were comparable to those in open resection group. CONCLUSION:Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer is a feasible but technically demanding procedure.The present study demonstrates the safety of the procedure,while oncologic results are comparable to the open surgery,with a favorable short-term outcome. To evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic resectionof rectal carcinoma and to compare the short-term outcomeof laparoscopic procedure with conventional open surgeryfor rectal cancer.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2004年第8期1167-1170,共4页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by Jiangsu Province Educational Foundation
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1Cooperman AM, Katz V, Zimmon D, Botero G. Laparoscopic colon resection: a case report. J Laparoendosc Surg 1991; 1:221-224.
  • 2Saclarides TJ, Ko ST, Airan M, Dillon C, Franklin J. Laparoscopic removal of a large colonic lipoma. Report of a case. Dis ColonRectum 1991; 34:1027-1029.
  • 3Hartley JM, Monson JR. The role of laparoscopy in the multimodality treatment of colorectal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 2002: 82:1019-1033.
  • 4Cirocco WC, Schwartzman A, Golub RW. Abdominal wall recurrence after laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer. Surgery 1994; 116:842-846.
  • 5Wexner SD, Cohen SM. Port site metastases after laparoscopic colo-rectal surgery for cure of malignancy. Br J Surg 1995; 82:295-298.
  • 6Lacy AM, Delgado S, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Castells A, Pique JM, Grande L, Fuster J, Targarona EM, Pera M, Visa J. Port site metastases and recurrence after laparoscopic colectomy. A randomized trail. Surg Endosc 1998; 12:1039-1042.
  • 7Slanetz CA Jr. Effectof no touch isolation on survival and recurrence in curative resections for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 1998; 5:390-398.
  • 8Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery- the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 1982; 69:613-616.
  • 9Monson JR, Darzi A, Carey PD, Guillou PJ. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic -assisted colectomy in an unselected group of patients. Lancet 1992; 340:831-833.
  • 10Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa H, Kitajima M. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoidal and rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45:1648-1654.

同被引文献139

引证文献30

二级引证文献296

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部