期刊文献+

非离子型造影剂在肾动脉介入治疗中的安全性研究 被引量:16

Safety of non-ionic contrast media during renal artery stenting
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 评价非离子型造影剂 (典比乐 370 )在肾动脉介入治疗中的安全性。方法  5 4例冠心病合并肾动脉狭窄患者 (内径减少 >5 0 % )接受肾动脉支架术和冠状动脉介入治疗 (10例单纯肾动脉狭窄患者仅行肾动脉支架术 )与 2 2例冠状动脉及肾动脉均正常者 (对照组 )比较。详细记录术中造影剂用量 ,同时测定患者肾动脉支架术前及术后 12h血清肌酐水平。结果 各组间手术成功率 ,并发症发生率无显著差异。各组间造影剂用量随接受支架植入数升高而增高。术后 12h血清肌酐水平较术前轻微升高 ,但无显著差异。各组间术前肌酐与术后 12h水平比较差异无显著性 (P =0 .0 9)。 Objective To evaluate the safety of non-ionic contras media during interventional treatment of renal artery stenosis (RAS). Methods Fifty four coronary artery disease patients associated with RAS (luminal narrowing>50%) underwent renal artery stent implantation and percutanous coronary intervention, only 10 of them with merely renoarterial stenosis undergone renal artery stent implantation. The successful rates of the procedure and complication together with the volumes of contrast media were recorded respectively. And the serum creatitine before and 12 hours after the successful procedure were also measured. Results Both rates of procedural success and complication were similar among the three groups. The serum creatitine levels, 12 hours after the procedure, showed no difference in comparing with the baseline. Conclusion Non-ionic contrast media (Iopamiro 370) could be safely used in patients with RAS.
出处 《介入放射学杂志》 CSCD 2004年第2期137-139,共3页 Journal of Interventional Radiology
关键词 非离子型造影剂 肾动脉 介入治疗 介入性 冠状动脉 Contrast media Non-ionic Renal artry Therapy, interventional
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献18

  • 1胡大一 李田昌 等.心脏及血管疾病的现代治疗[J].中国医药导刊,2000,9:73-76.
  • 2[1]Safian RD,Textor SC.Renal-artery stenosis.N Engl J Med,2001,344:431-442.
  • 3[2]Jean WJ,al-Bitar I,Zwicke DL,et al.High incidence of renal artery stenosis in patients with coronary artery disease.Cath Cardiovasc Diagn,1994,32:8-10.
  • 4[3]Radermacher J,Chavan A,Bleck J,et al.Use of Doppler ultrasonography to predict the outcome of therapy for renal-artery stenosis.N Engl J Med,2001,334:410-417.
  • 5[4]Cambria RP.Surgery: Indications and variables that affect procedural outcome,as well as morbidity and mortality.J Invas Cardiol,1998,10:55-58.
  • 6[5]Hansen KJ,Lundberg AH,Benjamin ME,et al.Is renal revascularization in diabetic patients worthwhile.J Vas Surg,1996,24:383-393.
  • 7[6]Van de Ven PJG,Beutler JJ,Kaatee R,et al.Transluminal vascular stent for ostial atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis.Lancet,1995,346:672-674.
  • 8[7]Dorros G,Jaff M,Mathiak L,He TH,and multicenter participants.Multicenter Palmaz stent renal artery stenosis revascularization registry report: 4-year follow-up of 1058 successful patients.In Henry M,Amor M.Tenth interventional course book of peripheral vascular intervention.1999,399-406.
  • 9[8]Zeller T,Tubler T.Endovascular treatment of renal artery stenosis.In Marco J,Serruys P,Biamino G et al.The Paris course on revascularization.2002,383-409.
  • 10杨进刚.RAS的血管成形技术[J].中国医药导刊,2000,(2):148-148.

共引文献67

同被引文献154

引证文献16

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部