摘要
最高人民法院审判委员会于2000年11月10日通过了《关于审理交通肇事刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》。应当引起注意的是,该《解释》的一项内容规定,交通肇事只造成财产重大损失的情况下,只有行为人无能力赔偿数额在30万元以上的,才构成交通肇事罪。笔者认为,这一规定从实质上改变了《刑法》第133条对交通肇事罪客观要件内容的规定;违反了民事责任和刑事责任不得相互转换的法律原理;并且与《刑法》第4条所规定的刑法面前人人平等原则相冲突,应当修改。
In the year 2000, the Judicial Committee of Supreme Court enacted a Judicial Act on traffic accident crime. The Act ordains that if the suspected criminal cannot compensate for the damages he caused to some degree, he will be convicted. The article points out that it is unreasonable. First, it actually distorts the provision of traffic accident crime in the Criminal Law. Second, it also blurs the distinction between civil responsibility and criminal responsibility. And third, it violates the criminal Equality Principle.
出处
《西南政法大学学报》
2003年第5期71-75,共5页
Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
