摘要
通过考证,作者认为中药漏芦的正品应该是菊科植物祁州漏芦Rhaponticum uniflorum的干燥根。而中国药典1990年版收载的漏芦正品之一禹州漏芦Echinops latifolius缺乏本草依据,化学成分亦与祁州漏芦完全不同,因此建议不宜作为正品漏芦使用。
Through a critical study of Loulu in ancient Chinese herbals, it is concluded that the botanical origin of Loulu should be Qizhou Loulu, the dried root of Rhapontioum uniflorum of family Compositae. while the dried root of Echinops latifolius, which is also one of the species specified in Chinese Pharmacopoeia, should not be used as Louln because of its deficiency of herbal evidences and totally different chemical constituents from those of the former. It is therefore recommended the latter plant be deleted from the Chinese Pharinacopoeia.
出处
《中国中药杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
1992年第10期579-581,共3页
China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica
关键词
本草考证
祁州漏芦
禹州漏芦
herbalogic study
Chinese Pharmacopoeia
Rhaponticum uniflorum
Echinops latifolius
