摘要
文章通过对近20年来血瘀证与活血化瘀研究的割析,探讨了宏观辨证与微观辨证相结合的方法学问题。(1)两种证候类型和国内用微观方法研究证本质的两种思路;(2)血液流变学与中医血瘀理论及血瘀证并不能真正融合,概念的随意附会与串换,已在学术领域造成许多混乱;(3)血瘀证与活血化瘀研究中造成混乱的原因剖析:(4)宏观辨证与微观辨证相结合的方法学原则;(5)以血瘀证与活血化瘀研究为例,提出宏观辨证与微观辨证相结合的研究思路和设想。文章通过总结分析其得失,并寻找其方法学上的原因,对于中医现代研究的健康发展具有重要意义。
The methodology of macroscopic differentiation of syndrome combing with microscopic differentiation of syndrome had been explored by the analysis of study of stagnation of blood symptom-complex and activating blood and resolving stagnation in recent 20 years in this article. ① two kinds of manifestation types and two thinking ways of researching the essential of symptom-complex with microscopic method; ② blood rheology, the theory of stagnation of blood of TCM and stagnation of blood symptom-complex can not really mix together, drawing wrong conclusions as one pleases and changes of conception resulting in confusion in academy fields; ③ the cause analysis of confusion in study of stagnation of blood and activating blood and resolving stagnation; ④ the principles of methodology of macroscopic differentiation of syndrome combing with microscopic differentiation of syndrome; ⑤ taking the study of stagnation of blood symptom-complex and activating blood and resolving stagnation for example, raising the research thinking way and imagination for macroscopic differentiation of syndrome combing with microscopic differentiation of syndrome.
出处
《中国医药学报》
CSCD
北大核心
1992年第5期3-8,共6页
China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy
