期刊文献+

磺脲类降糖药继发失效患者中成人隐匿性自身免疫糖尿病的患病率调查 被引量:9

Study of the LADA prevalence among diabetics with secondary sulfonylureas failure
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 探讨磺脲类降糖药继发失效 (SF)患者中成人隐匿性自身免疫糖尿病 (LADA)的患病率及其临床特点。 方法 在SF组 (n =2 38)中筛查谷氨酸脱羧酶抗体 (GAD Ab)和胰岛细胞抗体 (ICA) ,并将之与非继发失效 (NSF)组 (n =110 )中的阳性率比较。 结果 SF组中GAD Ab阳性的LADA的患病率为 13.9%( 33 2 38) ,NSF组为 10 .0 %( 11 110 ) ,两组差异无显著意义 (P >0 .0 5 )。LADA患者体重指数低于GAD Ab阴性者 (P <0 .0 1) ,发病年龄、血压、甘油三酯、C肽值均降低 (P <0 .0 5 )。联合检测GAD Ab和ICA ,SF组中LADA的患病率可达 2 2 .7%( 5 4 2 38) ,NSF中为 18.1%( 2 0 110 ) ,SF组与NSF组LADA患病率高于单独以GAD Ab检测 (P <0 .0 1)。 结论 SF的糖尿病患者中LADA的患病率较高。联合检测GAD Ab和ICA可提高LADA诊断的敏感性。 Objective To investigate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of LADA in patients with secondary sulfonylureas failure (SF) and compare the diagnostic sensitivities of LADA by GAD-Ab alone and the combined with ICA. Methods GAD-Ab and ICA were screened from sera of type 2 diabetic patients with SF (n=238) and NSF (n=110). GAD-Ab and ICA were respectively detected by radioimmunopreciptation assay and ELISA. Results The prevalences of LADA diagnosed by positive GAD-Ab in SF and NSF group were (33/238) 13.9% and (11/110) 10.0% respectively (P> 0.05). Compared with GAD-Ab negative group, BMI was significantly lower (P< 0.01), blood pressure, TG, C-peptide and age at onset of LADA were also lower (P<0.05). The prevalences of LADA in SF and NSF group screened by either GAD-Ab or ICA were (54/238) 22.7% and (20/110) 18.1% respectively (P>0.05), both of the prevalences were higher than those of LADA diagnosed only by positive GAD-Ab (P<0.005). Conclusion The prevalence of LADA in SF group is high. Combined detecting GAD-Ab and ICA can improve the diagnostic sensitivity of LADA. The clinical characteristics of LADA diagnosed by GAD-Ab alone and GAD-Ab /ICA in SF were similar.
出处 《中国糖尿病杂志》 CAS CSCD 2003年第3期168-171,共4页 Chinese Journal of Diabetes
基金 湖南省卫生厅科研基金资助项目 ( 2 0 0 1- Z0 4)
关键词 磺脲类 降糖药 隐匿性自身免疫糖尿病 SF LADA 自身免疫型 Sulfonylurea compounds Diabetes, autoimmune Prevalence
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[1]Bruce R,Zimmerman MD.Sulfonylureas.Endocrin Metab Clin North Am,1997,26:511-522.
  • 2[2]Matthews DR,Cull CA,Stratton IM,et al.UKPDS 26: Sulfonylurea failure in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients over six years. Diabet Med, 1998,15:297-303.
  • 3[3]Fukui M, Nakano k, Maruya E, et al. Diagnostic significance of antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase in Japanese diabetic patients with secondary oral hypoglycaemic agents failure. Clin Immuno Immunopath,1997,85:182-186.
  • 4[4]Fukui M, Nakano k, Shigeta H, et al. Antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase in Japanese diabetic patients with secondary oral hypoglycaemic therapy. Diabet Med, 1997,14:148-152.
  • 5[5]Rattarasarn C, Diosdado MA, Soonthornpan S, et al. Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase Antibodies in Non-insulin-dependent Diabetes patients with secondary sulphonylurea failure in Thailand. Diabet Res Clin Pract, 1997,37:193-197.
  • 6[6]Isomaa B, Almgren P, Henricsson M,et al. Chronic complications in patients with slowly progressing autoimmune type 1 diabetes (LADA). Diabetes Care, 1999,22:1347-1353.

同被引文献47

  • 1杨文英.磺脲类药物应用专家共识[J].国外医学(内分泌学分册),2004,24(4):255-259. 被引量:76
  • 2李秀钧,董砚虎,程丽霞,柳林.糖尿病研究进展── 第16届国际糖尿病联盟大会纪要[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,1998,14(2):72-77. 被引量:160
  • 3内科主治医生临床问答委员会.何谓磺脲类降糖药的失效?见:内科主治医生临床问答委员会编.内科主治医生临床问答.第1版.北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2002.1339-1340.
  • 4Groop LC, Schalin C, Franssla-Kaunki A, et al. Characteristics of non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients with secondary failure to oral antidiabatic therapy. Am J Med, 1989,87 : 183-190.
  • 5姚晓爱,许樟荣,王玉珍,焦凯,伍春荣,史琳涛,胡莲娜,倪彩虹.2型糖尿病患者治疗3年前后临床疗效对比分析[J].中国实用内科杂志,2007,27(15):1196-1198. 被引量:14
  • 6Croop LC, Schaiin - Ksunki A, et al. Characteistics of non - insulin - dependent diabetic patients with secondary failure to oral an- tidiabatic Therapy. AmJ Med 1989 ;87 : 183 - 190.
  • 7Tuomi T,GrooP LC,Zimmet PZ,et al. Autobodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase reveal latent autoimmune diabetes mellitus in adults with a non- insulin- dependent onsetof disease. Diabetes, 1993; 42: 359.
  • 8Dufinovic- Bello I, Hummel M, Ziegler AG, et al. Cellular immune respons to diverse islet cell antigens in IDDM. Diabetes,1996; 45: 795.
  • 9Groop LC, Schalin C, Franssla-Kaunki A, et al. Characteristics of non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients with secondary failure to oral antidiabatic therapy. Am J Med,1989,87:183-190.
  • 10Matthews DR,Cull CA,Stratton LM,et al.UKPDS26:Sulfonylurea failure in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients over six years[J].Diabet Med,1998,15:297-303.

引证文献9

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部