摘要
行为人实施诈骗行为时,如果被骗人(财产处分人)与被害人不具有同一性,即属三角诈骗;三角诈骗既具备诈骗罪的本质特征,又完全符合诈骗罪的构成要件;三角诈骗与盗窃罪(间接正犯)的关键区别在于,被骗人事实上是否具有处分被害人财产的权限或者是否处于可以处分被害人财产的地位;诉讼诈骗是典型的三角诈骗,应认定为诈骗罪;对于利用他人的债权凭证非法取得财物的行为,应当正确区分三角诈骗(诈骗罪)与其他犯罪的界限。
As to a swindling act, if the swindled, i.e. the person who has the right te dispose the property in question, and the victims are not the same, the act belongs to the tripartite fraud. With the essence of the crime of swindling, tripartite fraud meets also all the other constitutive requirements of the crime. The key difference between tripartite fraud and the crime of theft lies in that, whether the swindled actually has the right to dispose the property in question or stays in a position enabled to dispose the victims' property. Fraud by lawsuit is a kind of typical tripartite fraud, which should be regarded as the crime of swindling. The act of using others' documents of obligation to acquire property illegally, however, should be properly distinguished between the tripartite fraud and other crimes.
出处
《法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第2期93-106,共14页
Chinese Journal of Law
