期刊文献+

过失危险犯之存在性与可存在性思考 被引量:41

Thinking about the Negligent Potential Damage Offense: Existence and Can-exist
原文传递
导出
摘要 决定某类过错行为 ,包括过失危险行为在内可以犯罪化的基础不是主观过错 ,而是危险行为本身所具有的社会危害性。过失危险犯只能存在于危害公共安全法益的犯罪中 ,由于公共安全法益本身的特殊性 ,这类法益价值的外延已经突破其本身的价值而及于它的安全性 ,即威胁它的安全就是侵犯它的价值 ,而使过失危险行为具有直接侵犯公共安全法益价值的本质 ,进而具备犯罪化的报应基础。设立过失危险犯与刑法谦抑原则不冲突 ,反而有利于刑法诱导和刑法忠诚。 What decides a certain kind of wrong, including negligent dangerous act which can be criminalized is not subjective wrong, but the social harmfulness possessed by dangerous act itself. The negligent potential damage offense can only exist in the crime of endangering the legal interests of public security. Due to the particularity of the legal interests of the public security, the extension of the value of such kind of legal interests has already broken through the value per se, and involved its security. That means to threaten its security is to invade its value, and makes negligent dangerous act possess the essence of directly invading the legal interests of public security, and therefore, it has the retribution basis for criminalization. To establish negligent potential damage offense is consistent with the principle of circumspection of criminal law, and favorable for inducement of criminal law and loyalty of criminal law.
机构地区 北京大学
出处 《政法论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第1期121-128,共8页 Tribune of Political Science and Law
关键词 过失危险犯 公共安全 法益 犯罪化 故意犯罪 犯罪构成 可存在性 Negligent Danger Criminalization Public Security Legal Interest
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献3

共引文献584

同被引文献437

引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部