摘要
目的 比较两种缝线对腭裂术后伤口愈合的差异。方法 将临床上 180例腭裂患者分为A、B两组 ,每组 90例 ,A组病人术后伤口采用非吸收性丝线缝合 ,B组病人采用可吸收性缝合线缝合 ,分别观察术后1周内伤口出血、糜烂、穿孔及裂开情况 ,记录病人平均住院天数。结果 B组病人术后伤口出血、糜烂、穿孔及裂开发生率均低于A组病人 ,且平均住院天数明显少于A组病人。结论 可吸收缝线对腭裂术后伤口反应轻 ,伤口愈合佳。
Objective:To evaluate the effect of two kinds of sutures on patients with palate cleft.Methods:180 cases of patients with palate cleft were divided into A and B group. There were 90 cases in every group. The wounds of A group were sutured with non-absorbable suture. The wounds of B group were sutured with absorbable suture. The wound bleeding, erosion, perforation, slitting were observed during one week posoperation.Results:Wound healing of B group were faster and bettter compared with that of A group . Conclusions: Absorbable suture presents mild reaction to wound and better healing.
出处
《中国现代医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
2004年第4期64-65,共2页
China Journal of Modern Medicine
关键词
腭裂
可吸收缝合线
Palate Cleft
Absorbable Suture
