摘要
我国现行的民事诉讼法规定了财产保全制度 ,由于该制度的适用对象仅仅限于财产 ,而不适用于行为 ,这一立法上的漏洞 ,导致实践中存在大量无法利用该制度对当事人进行救济的情形。文章借鉴我国台湾地区和国外民事诉讼保全制度 ,将我国目前实施的可以以行为做为保全对象的“海事强制令”和“诉前临时禁令”,进一步扩大到一般民事诉讼领域 ,将行为纳入保全的范围 ,进而建构我国民事诉讼行为保全制度 。
In current civil procedural law of our country, the property preservation system is stipulated. For this system is only applicable to property, but not to acts. Such a loophole in legislation results in a great deal of fact that the parties cannot be aided by this system in practices. By reference to the preserving system in civil litigation of Taiwan regions of our country and foreign countries, this article extends from the current 'maritime mandatory order' and 'interim injunction before the institution of an action' which may take acts as preserving objects, further into the field of ordinary civil action, and brings acts into the scope of preservation, and then construct a system for preserving acts of civil litigation in our country, to form a dual systematic frame that lay equal stress on property preservation and act preservation.
出处
《广西政法管理干部学院学报》
2004年第2期76-79,82,共5页
Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
