摘要
宋玉《讽赋》、《登徒子好色赋》与司马相如《美人赋》 ,结构雷同 ,内容相近。因此 ,在宋玉作品真伪的研究中 ,三篇赋的承继问题便成为了一个研究的焦点。有人认为宋玉的两篇赋是后人抄袭《美人赋》的伪托之作 ,更有人认为司马相如《美人赋》是模仿宋玉两篇赋的 ,众说纷纭 ,莫衷一是。我们详细地分析研究了这三篇赋的结构、内容、艺术表现、文化环境和散文赋体的“借用”、“模拟”现象 ,认为《讽赋》、《登徒子好色赋》在艺术上较之《美人赋》显得稚嫩 ,在文化信息方面符合战国末期的文化环境 ,应当是宋玉的作品 ;《美人赋》较之宋玉的两篇赋在艺术上更为成熟 ,在文化方面符合西汉的文化环境 ,应当是晚于宋玉时代的作品 ;《美人赋》与宋玉两篇赋结构雷同、内容相近 ,是散文赋体创作中“借用”、“模拟”现象的具体反映 ,司马相如“模拟”和“借用”宋玉赋创作《美人赋》 ,是赋家创作中的正常的不必惊怪的现象。
There are identical constructions and similar contents among Song Yu's On Satire,On Deng Tuzi's Lubricity and Sima Xiangru's Ode to the Beauty ,which leads to the focus on distinguishing these three between the true Song Yu's works and the false.No condusion can by drawn about the differing views as to one saying that the two Song Yu's proses are forgeries lifted from Ode to the Beauty out the other opinion that Sima Xiangru mocked Song Yu.By analysing all three proses from the view point of constructions,contents,art performance,cultural environment and the'loan' and 'imitation' phenomenans of essay proses,we claim,comparing with the former two ,which convey coincident cultural information with the cultural environment oin the Warring Dynasty and assure the identity as Song Yu's, Ode to the Beauty is maturer in art since the coherent information with Western Han Dynasty so as to be sorted out the works after Song Yu's time.The specific reflection of 'loan' and 'imitation' in essay prose composition is performed through the identical constructions and similar contents of the three.No fuss that Sima Xiangru created Ode to the Beauty by 'loan' and 'imitate' Song Yu,which is quite common in composition of proses.
出处
《鞍山师范学院学报》
2004年第1期49-57,共9页
Journal of Anshan Normal University
关键词
宋玉
《讽赋》
《登徒子好色赋》
司马相如
《美人赋》
Song Yu
On Satire
On Deng Tuzi's lubricity
Sima Xiang-ru
Ode to the Beauty
Comparative study
