期刊文献+

先秦汉语语序特点的类型学观照 被引量:39

Typological Observations of Word Order Characteristics in Pre-Qin Chinese
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文讨论先秦汉语的两个类型学特征。在小句结构方面,先秦汉语以SVO为主,但不是纯粹的SVO型,而并存着SOV类型。其多种受事前置是句法化的语序,不同于现代汉语话题结构或“把”字句的受事前置,也不都同焦点有关。在介词方面,先秦汉语以前置词为主,但不是纯前置词语言。前置词多有后置词用法,这与它们来自动词、而当时还有句法性OV语序有关。先秦汉语还有后加“而”、“以”的框式介词。此外还讨论了定语一律前置、前置词悬空等特点的类型学后果。 This paper discusses some typological features in Pre-Qin Chinese. In terms of basic word order in clauses, SVO is a dominant type but not the only type then, with SOV order attested too. Unlike BA-clauses or patient-topicalization in modern Chinese, many patient-preposing patterns in Pre-Qin period are syntacticalized order, and are not necessarily focus-triggered. In terms of adpositions, prepositions are dominant but they are not the only type. Pre-Qin prepositions often have postpositional usage, due to their verb origin and the existence of syntactic OV order. There are also circumpositions with a linking word following a preposition phrase. It also briefly discusses typological consequences of unified modifier-head order and adposition stranding.
作者 刘丹青
出处 《语言研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第1期37-46,共10页 Studies in Language and Linguistics
关键词 先秦汉语 小句结构 语序类型 介词类型 话题结构 句法化 Pre-Qin Chinese clausal structure word order types adposition types.
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1LaPolla, Randy. On the change to verb-medial word order in proto-Chinese: Evidence from Tibeto-Burman[J]. Current lssues in Sino-Tibetan Linguistics. ed. by H. Kitamura, T. Nishida, and Y. Nagano. Osaka:National Museum of Ethnology, 1993.
  • 2郑张尚芳.白语是汉白语族的一支独立语言[A].石锋,潘悟云.中国语言学的新拓展—庆祝王士元教授六十五岁华诞[C].香港:香港城市大学出版社,1999.
  • 3Peyraube, Alain. On word order in Archaic Chinese [J]. Parris: Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale.1997, Vol. 26 No.1.
  • 4Djiamouri, Redouane. Markers of predication in Shang Bone inscriptions [A]. In Hilary Chappell (eel.)Sinitic Grammar." Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives[C]. Oxford University Press 2001.
  • 5本尼迪克特(P K.Benidict)著,马提索夫(J.A.Mmisoff)编,乐赛月,罗美珍译.汉藏语言概论[M].北京:中国社会科学院民族研究所语言室,1984.
  • 6Wang, William S-Y (ed.) The Ancestry of Chinese[M]. Monograph of the Journal of Chinese Linguistics,1998.
  • 7Greenberg,Joseph.Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements[A].In Greenberg,Joseph H.(ed.)Universals of Language[C].Cambridge:M.I.T.Press.1966[初版1963].陆丙甫,陆至极译.国外语言学,1984,(2).
  • 8Siewierska, Anna. Word Order Rules[M]. New York: Croom Helm, 1988.
  • 9Bauer, Brigitte. From Latin to French: the linear development of word order[A]. Draft, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 1998. (From Internet).
  • 10周法高.中国古代语法·称代编.台北:中研院史语所专刊,1959,:39-39.

二级参考文献22

  • 1杨合鸣,李云贵.《诗经》“名·是·动”式新考[J].武汉大学学报(人文科学版),1987,41(4):82-88. 被引量:7
  • 2郭锡良.介词“于”的起源和发展[J].中国语文,1997(2):131-138. 被引量:151
  • 3何金松.1994《虚词历时词典》.湖北人民出版社.
  • 4Comrie, B. 1981. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology.
  • 5DeLancey, S. 1997. Grammaticalization and the gradience of categories: relator nouns and postpositions in Tibetan and Burmese In Joan Bybee, et al eds. Essays of Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givon. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 6Dik, S. C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar Part Ⅰ : The Structure of the Clause. Kees Hengeveld, ed. 2nd ed. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 7Edkins, J. 1868. A Grammar of Colloquial Chinese, as Exhibited in the Shanghai Dialect. Shanghai:Presbyterian Mission Press. 2nd ed.
  • 8Ernst, T. 1988. Chinese postpositions?-again. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Vol. 16: 2.
  • 9Greenberg, J. 1980. Circumfixes and typological change. In E. C. Traugott, et al. eds. Papers from the International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 10Greenberg, J.1995. The diachronic typological approach to language. In Shibatani, M. and T. Bynon,eds. , Approaches to Language Typology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

共引文献383

同被引文献486

引证文献39

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部