期刊文献+

第二代佳洁士电动牙刷与手动牙刷对牙菌斑去除功效的比较 被引量:1

Plaque removal efficacy of a new generation powered toothbrush Crest SpinBrush Pro^(TM) related to two manual toothbrushes
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 :研究新一代电动牙刷 -佳洁士SpinBrushProTM与两种先进设计的手动牙刷 -欧乐 -BCrossAction和高露洁Navigator的去除菌斑功效。方法 :本研究采用随机对照、检查者单盲、九循环交叉设计 ,为期 2个月。受试者分别使用电动牙刷和两种对照牙刷各 3次。使用Turesky等改良的Quigley -Hein指数 ,在刷牙前后记录菌斑值。结果 :共 12 7名受试者完成实验。佳洁士SpinBrushProTM的菌斑去除值较高露洁Navigator和欧乐 -BCrossAction分别高 4 9%和 2 8% ,结果具有统计学意义 (P <0 .0 0 1)。结论 :佳洁士SpinBrushProTM的菌斑去除功效优于高露洁Narigator和欧乐 -B -CrossAction的菌斑去除功效。 AIM:To assess the plaque removal efficacy of a new generation power toothbrush-Crest SpinBrush Pro TM in comparison with 2 kinds of manual toothbrush, the Oral-B CrossAction and Colgate Navigator.METHODS:This study is randomized, controlled, examiner blind, nine-period, cross-over and in two-month period. Subjects brushed 3 times with all 3 kinds of toothbrushes seperately. Plaque was scored before and after brush, using modified Quigley-Hein Index.RESULTS:The result from 127 subjects showed that the Crest SpinBrush TM Pro group had 49% and 28% plaque removal more than the Colgate Navigator and Oral-B CrossAction group (P<0.001).CONCLUSION:The plaque removal efficacy of spinBrush Pro TM is better than that of colgate Navigator and Oral-B-Cross-Action. [
出处 《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》 CAS 2003年第7期400-403,共4页 Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
关键词 电动牙刷 手动牙刷 菌斑去除 power brush manual toothbrush plaque removal
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[1]Beals D, Ngo T, Feng Y, et al. Development and laboratory evaluation of a new toothbrush with a novel brush head design[J].Am J Dent, 2000, 13:5A
  • 2[2]Sharma NC, Qaquish JG, Galustians HJ, et al. An advanced toothbrush with improved plaque removal efficacy [ J ]. Am J Dent,2000,13 :15A
  • 3[3]Singh, SM, Battista GW, Petrone DM, et al. The comparative plaque removal efficacy of two advanced manual toothbrush designs in two independent clinical studies[J]. J Clin Dent, 2001,12:83
  • 4[4]Bustillo E, Cartwright S, Battista GW, et al. Effectiveness of a battery- powered toothbrush on plaque removal: Comparison with four manual toothbrushes[ J]. Compend Cont Educ Dent ,2000,21:25
  • 5[5]Rustogi KN, Curtis JP, vlope Ar, et al. Refinement of modified navy plaque index to increase efficiency at gumline and interproximal tooth areas [ J ]. J Clin Dent, 1992,3: C9
  • 6[6]Ruhlman Cd, Bartizek Rd, Biesbrock AR. Comparative efficacy of two battery - powered toothbrushes on dental plaque removal[J]. J Clin Dent ,2002,1 3: 95
  • 7[7]Ruhlman CD, Bartizek RD, Walters PA, et al. Plaque removal efficacy of a battery - operated power toothbrush compared to a manual toothbrush [ J ]. Am J Dent, 2001 , 14: 191
  • 8[8]Quigley Ga, Hein JW. Comparative cleaning efficacy of manual and power brushing[ J]. JADA, 1962, 65:26
  • 9[9]Turesky S, Gilmore ND, Glickman L. Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethy I analogue of victamine C [ J ]. J Periodontol,1970,41:41
  • 10[10]Hou L, Walters P, Bartizek RD, et al. Plaque removal by a battery - powered toothbrush relative to a manual toothbrush [ J ].J Dent Res, 2002

同被引文献5

  • 1李凤玲,乔宏,刘园,王劲.臭氧与机械冲洗联合作用对微生物杀灭效果的探讨[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2005,15(7):870-871. 被引量:4
  • 2卞金有 胡德渝.预防口腔医学(第4版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.32-35.
  • 3Warren PR.Development of an oscillating/rotating/pulsating toothbrush:The Oral-B professionalCaretrad mark series.J Dent,2005,33S1:1
  • 4Jongenelis AP,Wiedemann W.A comparison of plaque removal effectiveness of an electric versus a manual toothbrush in children.ASDC J Dent Child,2001,12(1):7
  • 5Stubinger S,Sader R,Filippi A.The use of ozone in dentistry and maxillofacial surgery.Quintessence Int,2006,37(5):353

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部