期刊文献+

支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄的临床疗效 被引量:2

Treatment of carotid artery stenosis by stent placement
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 探讨支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄的近期临床疗效。方法 将临床经颈部B超、TCD、DSA脑血管造影确诊的颈动脉狭窄患者 48例 ,实施狭窄段置入自膨式支架 (WALLSTENT或SMART) ,12例行后扩张 ,11例使用滤器装置 ,围手术期给予抗血小板聚集等治疗。观察患者临床症状体征的改变以及影像学的改变。结果  2例手术失败未能成功置入支架 ;术后并发脑出血 1例 ,脑栓塞 1例 ,支架内血栓形成 1例 ,除 1例脑出血死亡外 ,其余 2例治疗后恢复 ;其余 43例患者均取得很好的临床效果 ,1~ 6个月的随访中 ,无 1例出现复发。手术并发症和后遗症发生率低 ,近期疗效满意。结论 CAS治疗颈动脉狭窄可行性好 ,近期疗效肯定 ,是临床上有推广潜力的治疗颈动脉狭窄的方法 ,但远期疗效尚需进一步观察。 Objective To investigate the short term effect of stent placement for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Methods Self expandable stents (WALLSTENT or SMART) were placed in the stenotic sections in 48 patients with carotid artery stenosis confirmed by B mode ultrasonography or transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Postoperative dilation was performed in 12 cases and filter system used in 11 cases. During the perioperation period, anti coagulation medication was used in all patients. Results The operation was successful in most cases except in 2 cases. The postoperative complications included cerebral embolism in 1 case, thrombosis following stent placement in 1 case, death due to cerebral hemorrhage in 1 case. The left 2 patients recovered after treatment. Favorable clinical outcomes were found in all the left 43 patients. After a follow up for 1~6 months, no recurrence of carotid artery stenosis was found. The short term effect was satisfactory. Conclusion Stent placement is a potential valuable clinical way for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis. However, the long term effect needs to be further studied.
出处 《第三军医大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第20期1821-1823,共3页 Journal of Third Military Medical University
关键词 颈动脉狭窄 支架 近期疗效 carotid artery stenosis stent short term effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献3

共引文献38

同被引文献16

  • 1孙玉衡,陈捷,马志刚,彭晓新,阎冰.颅外动脉狭窄支架置入治疗的临床应用[J].中华神经科杂志,2005,38(1):49-50. 被引量:8
  • 2赵展,舒航,曾少建.Smart支架治疗颈动脉狭窄65例临床观察[J].实用医学杂志,2005,21(18):2069-2070. 被引量:2
  • 3高谦,彭晓新,程志远,孙玉衡,马志刚.支架成形术治疗颈动脉狭窄常见问题及对策的探讨[J].中国医师杂志,2006,8(10):1362-1363. 被引量:13
  • 4Kazmierski MK. Stenosis of carotid arteries[J]. Wiad Lek,2003, 56(5-6) :260-265.
  • 5Simonetti G,Gandini R,Versaei F,et al. Carotid artery stenting: findings based on 8 years' experience[J]. Radiol Med, 2009,114 (1):95 110.
  • 6Brott TG, Hobson RW, Howard G, et al. Stenting versus endar- terectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis[J]. N Engl J Med,2010,363(1) :11 23.
  • 7Kimiagar I, Klein C, Rabey JM, et al. Carotid artery stenting in high risk patients with carotid artery stenosis not eligible for end arterectomy:clinical outcome after 5 years[J]. Isr Med Assoc J, 2008,10(2) : 121-124.
  • 8Kastrup A,Groschel K, Krapf H, et al. Early outcome of carotidangioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection de vices: a systematic review of the literature [J]. Stroke, 2003, 34 (3) :813-819.
  • 9Bosiers M,Peeters P, Deloose K, et al. Does carotid artery stenting work on the long run: 5 year results in high-volume centers (ELOCAS registry) [J]. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 2005,46 (3) :241-247.
  • 10Bosiers M, Peeters P, Deloose K, work on the long (ELOCAS registry) (3):241-247. run: 5 year [ J]. J Card et al. Does carotid artery stenting results in high-volume centers iovase Surg (Torino),2005,46.

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部