摘要
与三段论式科学推理不同 ,法律推理的大、小前提都是事实判断和价值判断的复合体 ,因而价值评价是由案件事实之“是”推出当事人之“应当”的逻辑中介 ;没有价值评价 ,就没有判决结论的证成。法律推理逻辑机制的正当理由是保护与社会公共利益相一致的当事人行为 ,当事人“能够”、“不得不”行为是法律推理逻辑机制的现实基础 ,而法律规范的“可普遍化性”是法律推理的逻辑根据 ,也是法律推理的基本公理。
Different from syllogistic scientific reasoning, both the major and minor premises of legal reasoning are combinations of judgement of truth and judgement of value. As a result, the judgement of value is the logic intermediary between the premises, i.e. facts of the case, and the conclusion, i.e. rights and obligations of the parties. The conclusions in the judgement can not be reached without the judgement of value. The justification of mechanism of legal reasoning is the protection of acts of parties that are compatible with public interests. Acts which the parties 'can' or 'have to' do are the realistic basis of the legal reasoning mechanism, whereas the 'universalizibility' of legal norms is the logical basis as well as a self-evident basic truth of the legal reasoning mechanism. The paper gives a detailed description of the process of legal reasoning.
出处
《法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第1期64-82,共19页
Chinese Journal of Law
