期刊文献+

左冠状动脉主干狭窄195例临床分析 被引量:4

Clinical analysis of 195 cases left main coronary artery stenosis
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 探讨左冠状动脉主干 (左主干 )狭窄的临床特点、诊断及治疗方法。方法 按冠状动脉造影 (CAG)结果将冠状动脉管径狭窄程度分为轻、中、重及完全闭塞 4组 ,并按其他冠状动脉受累情况分为孤立左主干组 9例 (4 6 2 % )、左主干 +1支组 15例 (7 6 9% )、左主干 +2支组 5 3例(2 7 18% )、左主干 +3支组 118例 (6 0 5 1% )。结果 经CAG确诊的 2 892例冠心病患者中左主干狭窄 195例 (6 74 % ) ,检出率低。临床主要表现为不稳定心绞痛 16 4例 (84 1% ) ,心肌梗死 (MI) 12 5例(6 4 1% )。冠状动脉旁路移植术 (CABG) 5 7例 ,术后 4 7例 (84 2 % )患者心绞痛消失。 5例行无保护性左主干病变直接支架术 ,术后无心绞痛再发。结论 左主干狭窄临床症状严重。CAG是确诊的唯一手段。CABG为最佳治疗方法。无保护性左主干病变直接支架术可用于有适应症患者。 Objective To explore the clinical features diagnosis and treatment of left main coronary artery (LM) disease. Methods According to the results of coronary angiography,significant stenosis was defined as ≥50% stenosis. Isolated LM group had 9 patients (4.62%),one-vessel stenosis LM group 15 patients (7.69%),two-vessel stenosis LM group 53 patients (27.18%) and three-vessel stenosis LM group 118 patients (60.51%). Results 195 cases (6.74%) of LM stenosis were found. The incidence rate was low. 164 patients (84.1%) had unstable angina,and 125 patients (64.1%) had myocardial infarction. Coronary artery bypass surgery was performed in 57 patients (29.2%) and the angina disappeared in most of them (84.2%). Five patients received unprotected LM stenosis and angina disappeared in all. Conclusion LM stenosis has sever symptoms. Coronary angiography is the only way for diagnosis and CABG the best treatment. Unprotected LM stenosis is valuable for some patients.
出处 《中国介入心脏病学杂志》 2003年第6期295-296,共2页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
关键词 左冠状动脉主干狭窄 临床特点 冠心病 冠脉造影 心绞痛 CABG LM stenosis Coronary angiography Coronary artery bypass Intracoronary stent implantation
  • 相关文献

同被引文献15

  • 1CHANCE研究组.无保护左主干病变支架置入术预后及影响因素的分析——中国无保护左主干病变支架置入术注册(CHANCE)研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(3):210-215. 被引量:19
  • 2张军,袁琛,王钢,王玉刚,彭万忠,曹绪芬,李洪稳,韩立宪,元柏民.5800例冠状动脉造影术分析[J].中国医药导刊,2005,7(4):235-236. 被引量:4
  • 3周永昌,郭万学.超声医学·3版[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,1999:581-582.
  • 4Wallentin L,Lagerqvist B, Husted S, et al. Outconle at 1 year alter an invasive compared with a non-invasive strategy in unstable coronary artery disease : the FRISC Ⅱ invasive randomised trial. FRISC Ⅱ Investigators. Fast revascularisation during instability in coronary artery, disease[ J]. Lancet, 2000,356 (9223) :9-16.
  • 5Atie J,Brugada P,Brugada J,et al. Clinical presentation and prognosis of left main coronary artery disease in the 1980s[J]. Eur Heart J,1991,12(4) :495- 502.
  • 6Rosman J, Shapiro M, Hanon S, et al. Electrocardiographic findings of severe left main coronary artery stenosis [ J ]. Int J Angiol, 2006,15 ( 1 ) : 9-11.
  • 7Diderholm E,Andren B,Frostfeldt G,et al. ST depression in ECG at entry indicates severe coronary lesions and large benefits of an early invasive treatment strategy in unstable coronary artery disease. The FRISC Ⅱ ECG substudy [ J ]. Eur Heart J,2002,23 ( 1 ) :41-49.
  • 8Nikus KC, Eskola M J, Virtanen VK, et al. ST-depression with negative T waves in leads V4-VS-a marker of severe coronary artery disease in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome : a prospective study of angina at rest, with troponin, clinical, electrocardiographic, and angiographic correlation [ J ]. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol,2004,9 ( 3 ) :207-214.
  • 9Yamaji H, Iwasaki K, Kusachi S, et al. Prediction of acute left main coronary artery obstruction by 12-lead electrocardiography. ST segment elevation in lead aVR with less ST segment elevation in lead V( 1 ) [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2001,38(5):1348-1354.
  • 10Kosuge M, Kimura K, Ishikawa T, et al. Predictors of left main or three-vessel disease in patients who have acute coronary syndromes with non-ST-segment elevation [ J]. Am J Cardiol,2005,95 ( 11 ) :1366-1369.

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部