摘要
从满江红AzollaLam .萍 藻共生体中提取DNA进行的RAPD系统分析通常忽视了满江红样品的异质性。本研究通过获得无藻的满江红 ,比较有藻萍、无藻萍和离体藻之间的RAPD指纹图谱。发现从有藻萍中提取DNA的扩增反应来源于萍藻双方DNA的共同影响。依引物和植物样本的不同 ,共生双方对扩增产物的贡献结果不同 ,说明了用无藻萍进行RAPD检测的重要性。对满江红三膘组 5个种的 1 1个无藻萍样本进行了RAPD分析 ,由 9个引物产生的 1 2 7个DNA多态片段用于计算样本间的Jaccard相似系数和UPGMA树状聚类图。结果表明 :3个蕨状满江红A .filiculoidesLam .样本聚为一类 (种内相似系数 :0 .45 6- 0 .70 2 ) ;2个墨西哥满江红A .mexicanaPresyl样本 (相似系数 :0 .5 87)与 2个小叶满江红A .microphyllaKaulfuss样本 (相似系数 :0 .2 0 3)聚为一类 ;2个卡洲满江红A .carolinianaWilld .样本聚为一类(相似系数 :0 .368) ;但 2个洋洲满江红A .rubraR .Brown样本明显分开 (相似系数 :0 .1 90 ) ,其中日本来源的洋洲满江红与蕨状满江红聚合 (相似系数 :0 .2 0 6)。根据现有的RAPD数据 ,结合三膘组满江红同工酶、有性杂交等证据讨论了三膘组中 :( 1 )将日本满江红与大洋洲满江红均认作是A .rubra的合理性问题 ;( 2 )蕨状满江红、?
Azolla Lam. is a small genus of free-floating ferns symbiotic with cyanobacteria. The heterogeneity of Azolla samples has been usually ignored when DNA was extracted from intact Azolla-Anabaena complex for Azolla phylogeny analysis based on RAPD. In this study, the Anabaena-free Azolla was induced from Azolla-Anabaena complex to compare the RAPD banding patterns amplified by different primers with intact Azolla as well as isolated Anabaena azollae. The banding patterns of Azolla with Anabaena were detected to be affected by two symbiotic partners and their contributions to PCR products varied with the tested Azolla sample and the used primer, which indicates the importance of using Anabaena-free Azolla for RAPD analysis of Azolla species. For a better understanding of the interspecific relationships within the section Azolla, 11 accessions classified as five species in this section were identified by RAPD marker with their Anabaena-free Azolla. A total of 127 polymorphic bands amplified from nine primers were selected to generate Jaccard's similarity coefficients and to construct UPGMA dendrogram. The results have shown that three accessions referred to as A. filiculoides were grouped together with intraspecific similarity coefficients from 0.456 to 0.702; two accessions of A. mexicana (similarity coefficients 0.587) were grouped with two accessions of A. microphylla (similarity coefficient 0.203) and two accessions of A. caroliniana were grouped together with similarity coefficient 0.368; but two accessions referred to as A. rubra were distinctly separated with similarity coefficient 0.190 and the accession collected from Japan clustered with A. filiculoides group. Coupled with other evidence such as isozyme and sexual hybridization among sect. Azolla, the following problems have been discussed: (1) the rationality to refer Azolla accessions from both Japan and Oceania to A. rubra; (2) the affinity among A. filiculoides, A. microphylla and A. mexicana; and (3) the taxonomic treatment of A. caroliniana. It is considered that (1) A. japonica and A. rubra should be treated as two independent species, (2) A. filiculoides is an independent species while A. microphylla and A. mexicana cannot be treated as two separate species because of their very close genetic relationship, and (3) the taxonomic status of A. caroliniana cannot yet be determined with certainty.
出处
《植物分类学报》
CSCD
北大核心
2003年第6期509-519,共11页
Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica
基金
福建省自然科学基金 (B991 0 0 2 4)
中国国家留学基金委 (CSC)资助~~
关键词
满江红
无藻萍
RAPD
种间关系
Azolla
Anabaena-free azolla
RAPD
interspecific relationship
