摘要
诉讼指挥权的正当性不仅源于人们对诉讼经济性的追求 ,而且还在于它具有矫正正当程序原理内在局限的功能。西方法治国家民事诉讼程序立法中关于诉讼指挥权的规定反映了诉讼指挥权制度的共同要求和普遍规则。处于民事诉讼体制转型的中国民事诉讼法 ,目前正面临着发展和创新诉讼指挥权制度的历史重任。完善中国诉讼指挥权的总体思路是 :以国际社会诉讼指挥权的共同规则为参照 ,建立符合中国审判实践要求的诉讼指挥权规则体系 ;改革法院的事实审理方式 ,合理界定法官在开庭审理过程中行使诉讼指挥权的范围 ;从保证当事人对纠纷解决程序正当性信赖的要求出发 ,建立诉讼指挥权的救济机制。
Orders in litigation are justified by their role in correcting the intrinsic limitations of due procedure, in addition to the quest for economy of action. The related regulations in civil procedure law in Western democratic countries reflect a common need for and universal principle of orders in litigation. As Chinese civil procedure law is undergoing an institutional transformation, it is a historical moment to develop and innovate in institutions of orders in litigation. The follows may be taken as a general strategy to improve relevant Chinese institutions: set up a system of orders in litigation that fits the practice of trial in China, while taking as reference common principles in the international community; improve the court trial method and reasonably define judge's orders in litigation; and set up a remedial mechanism of commandment in litigation while ensuring interested parties' confidence in the legitimacy of dispute resolving procedure.
出处
《中国社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2003年第6期108-122,共15页
Social Sciences in China
