期刊文献+

模糊综合评价法在水鸟栖息地保护等级评价中的应用——天津地区水鸟栖息地评价案例 被引量:12

THE APPLICATION OF FUZZY SYNTHETIC METHOD TO THE EVALUATION OF THE WATERBIRD HABITAT CONSERVATION GRADE:A CASE STUDY OF TIANJIN WETLAND
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用模糊综合评价法 ,以游禽、涉禽及珍稀濒危物种的种类和数量为评价因子 ,对天津地区 5处水鸟栖息地的保护等级进行了评价 .评价结果表明 ,北大港水库得分 0 .996 ,属极其重要等级 ,团泊洼水库、尔王庄水库和七里海水库得分分别为 0 .72 6 ,0 .5 0 4 ,0 .5 18,均属较重要等级 ,西河岳龙湿地得分 0 .4 76 ,属一般等级 .因此 ,北大港水库、团泊洼水库、尔王庄水库和七里海水库应得到重点保护 .西河岳龙湿地是一个重要的灰鹤越冬场所 ,应注意在灰鹤越冬季节内对该地区的保护 .天津案例表明 ,模糊综合评价法在利用现有水鸟调查数据对水鸟栖息地的保护等级进行综合。 Fuzzy Synthetic Method is used in the evaluation of the waterbird habitat conservation grade of Tianjin. The species and number of the Natatorial birds, wading birds and protected birds are selected as the evaluation factors. The importance of the waterbird habitats is classified into 4 grades: very important,important, common and bad. The results suggest that the Beidagang reservoir belongs to the very important grade and it should be given priority in conservation. Tuanbowa, Erwangzhuang and Qilihai belong to the important grade, these three habitats should also be protected. Although Xihe Yuelong belongs to the common grade, it should be protected in winter because it is an Common Crane( Gxul arul ) wintering habitat. The Tianjin case study indicates that Fuzzy Synthetic Method can play an important role in the comprehensive and quantified evaluation of the waterbird habitat conservation grade.
出处 《北京师范大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第5期677-682,共6页 Journal of Beijing Normal University(Natural Science)
基金 国际鹤类基金会 (ICF)资助项目 英国石油公司 (BP)资助项目
关键词 模糊综合评价法 水鸟栖息地 保护等级 天津 Fuzzy Synthetic Method waterbird habitat conservation grade Tianjin
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1阎传海.安徽省萧县皇藏峪自然保护区评价研究[J].农村生态环境,1997,13(4):12-15. 被引量:32
  • 2黄崇福.模糊信息的分析方法[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1995..
  • 3张淑萍,张正旺,徐基良,孙全辉,刘冬平.天津地区水鸟区系组成及多样性分析[J].生物多样性,2002,10(3):280-285. 被引量:59
  • 4沈珍瑶,谢彤芳,钱天伟.环境质量评价中模糊综合评判法、灰色聚类法及物元分析法的比较[J].污染防治技术,1997,10(2):72-74. 被引量:15
  • 5马志军.[D].北京:中国科学院生态中心,1998.
  • 6Fuller M. Ornithological evaluation for wildlife conservation[M]// Usher M. Wildlife conservation evaluation. [S. I. ] Chapman and Hall, 1986:247-269.
  • 7Gaston L. Effects of scale and habitat on the relationship between regional distribution and local abundance[J]. Oikos, 1990, 58:329.
  • 8Novoton P. Effect of habitat persistence on the relationship between geographic distribution and local abundance[J]. Oikos, 1991, 61:481.
  • 9Tucker L. Birds in Europe.. their conservation status[M]. Cambridge: Birdlife international, 1994.
  • 10Fornasari L, Carli E D, Bottoni L. A method for establishing bird conservation value at a landscape level [J]. Bird Conservation International, 1997, 7 ~ 81.

二级参考文献10

共引文献103

同被引文献217

引证文献12

二级引证文献149

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部