期刊文献+

高血压和休克患者有创与无创血压监测的比较 被引量:8

Comparisons of the effects of invasive and noninvasive blood pressure monitoring for hypertensive or shock patients
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨高血压、休克患者血压监测的最佳方法。方法48例ICU患者,高血压和休克各24例。每位患者分别选择左侧或右侧桡动脉穿刺行直接动脉血压连续监测,同时同侧肱动脉间断进行无创血压测定,分别记录两种方法的测量值。结果高血压患者无创测压的结果明显低于有创测压,休克患者的情况正好相反。经t检验,P均<0.01,有显著性差异。结论对于休克患者,有条件时应尽可能采用有创测压。 Objective To find the best method of monitoring blood pressure in hypertensive or shock patients.Methods24patients with hypertension and24with shock were chosen in ICU.Each patient was punctured in the radical artery to monitor invasive blood pressure and the values were recorded.Meanwhile,noninvasive blood pressure were monitored and recorded in the brachial artery in the same arm.Res ults Among hypertensives,the value of noninvasive blood pressure was significantly lower than that of invasive blood pressure(P<0.01)but it was adverse among shock patients.t-test showed t=2.63,2.59and2.91,2.58,P<0.01respectively.Conclus ion If possible,we should choose invasive monitoring in examining blood pressure for shock patients.
出处 《南方护理学报》 2003年第5期47-48,共2页 Nanfang Journal of Nursing
关键词 高血压 休克 桡动脉穿刺 有创血压监测 无创血压监测 hypertension shock invasive monitoring of blood pressure noninvasive monitoring of blood pressure
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献4

  • 1邓利军.有创血压与无创血压的比较[J].实用护理杂志,1994,10(1):7-7. 被引量:7
  • 2万亚君,中华麻醉学杂志,1995年,15卷,254页
  • 3王玉英,中华麻醉学杂志,1989年,9卷,27页
  • 4刘俊杰,现代麻醉学,1987年,1033页

共引文献14

同被引文献98

引证文献8

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部