期刊文献+

带状疱疹患者的神经痛与生活质量 被引量:18

The quality of life of post herpes zoster neuralgia
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨综合治疗带状疱疹神经痛疗效与生活质量的关系。方法:128例带状疱疹神经痛患者随机抽签分为4组,每组32例,Ⅰ组只应用抗病毒药物,止痛药及营养神经的药物。Ⅱ组除Ⅰ组药物外及早加用适量激素。Ⅲ组除Ⅰ、Ⅱ组药物加用针灸疗法。Ⅳ组采用综合治疗,除Ⅲ组治疗外再加用中药口服。各组治疗疗程相同。使用疼痛目测类比评分法(VAS)评估疼痛缓解程度。使用情绪评分及遗留症工作或家务能力进行治疗前后心理测试。结果:治疗后VAS评分Ⅳ组与前3组相比较,差异具有显著性意义(P<0.05),情绪评分治疗前后各组自身对照差异显著(P<0.05)。结论:采用第Ⅳ组方法治疗带状疱疹神经痛能达到满意效果,患者的生活质量明显改善。 AIM:To investigate the effects and quality of life of composite treatment in post herpes zoster neuralgia (PHZN). METHODS:One hundred and twenty eight patients with PHZN were randomly divided into four groups(32 cases in each),Ⅰgronp was treated with antiviral,antalgica and trophic nerve,Ⅱgroup was treated with combination of adrenocorticoids and treatment of Ⅰgroup.Ⅲgroup was treated with combination of acupuncture and mox ibustion and treatment of Ⅱgroup. Ⅳgroup was treated with oral traditional Chi nese medicine and treatment of Ⅲgroup. Period of reatment was the same in each group. Visual analogue scales(VAS)was utilized to assess the degree of easement of pain. A depression scale remnant syndrome,activity of working and homework we re used to evaluate the psychological state before and after treatment. RESULTS:There were significant differences between Ⅳgroup and the others gro ups in VAS(P< 0.05).There were significant differences between before and after treatment in depression scale in each group(P< 0.05).
作者 谢继红
出处 《中国临床康复》 CSCD 2003年第26期3610-3611,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation
关键词 带状疱疹 神经痛 生活质量 综合治疗 药物治疗 针灸治疗 中药 The treatment of Ⅳgroup is an effective approach in treatment of PHZN.It may improve the quality of life in patients with PHZN.
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献19

  • 1Rowbotham MC, Petersen KL and Fields HL. Is postherpetic neualgia more than one disorder? IASP Newsletter. 1999(Fall) :3 ~7.
  • 2Bonica JJ. Management of pain. 2nd Ed. Philade- phia: Led & Febiger. 1990:257 -260.
  • 3Spitzer WO. State of science 1986; Quality of life and functional status as target variables for research[J]. J Chron Dis, 1987, 40(6): 465~469
  • 4Berwick DM, Budman S,Damico-W hite J, et al. Assessment if psycho logical morbidityin promary care: explorations with the general health questionnaire[J]. J Chron Dis, 1987,40:71~79
  • 5Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Cartcr WB, et al. The Sickness Impact and final revision of a health status measure [ J ]. Med Carc, 1981,19:787~805
  • 6Hunt Sm, Mc Jebba SP, McEwen J, et al. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation stady[J]. J Epidemiol Commun Health, 1980, 34:281~289
  • 7Essink Bot ML, Krabbc PF, Bonscl GJ, et al. An emphirical comparison of four gencric health status measures. The nottingham health profile, the medical outcomes study 36-item short-form health survey, the COOP/WONCA charts, aqol instrument[J]. Med Care, 1997, 35(5): 522~537
  • 8Torrance GW, Feeny D. Uilities and quality-adjusted life years[J]. Int J Technol Assess Health Care,1989, 5(4): 559~575
  • 9Gafni A. The standard gamblc method: What is being measured and how it is interpreted[J]. Health Scrv Rcs, 1994, 29(2): 207~224
  • 10Dongping Yin, Howard PF, Curtis PL. Evaluating health services: the importance of patients' preferemce and quality of life[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995, 165(6): 1 323~1 328

共引文献86

同被引文献169

引证文献18

二级引证文献113

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部