经济转型中的企业退出机制——关于北京市中关村科技园区的一项经验研究被引量：76

The Mechanism of Firm Exit in Economic Transition:An Empirical Analysis for Zhongguancun Science Park of Beijing

导出

摘要本文运用来自北京市中关村科技园区的一套独特数据 ,从企业退出这个角度探讨决定中关村高科技企业成长的相关因素 ,尤其是企业的效率因素、企业负债和所有制性质 (或行政隶属关系 )对退出的影响。本文的基本发现是 ,效率高低日益成为决定中关村高科技企业生存的重要因素 ,这表明经过二十多年的经济改革开放 ,市场力量的重要性已日渐上升。另一方面 ,企业负债也成为制约企业生存与成长的重要因素。但是 ,企业净资产负债率对不同所有制企业的退出的影响也不尽相同 ,国有企业总体上不受其影响 ,而且行政隶属关系越高 ,所受影响也就越小 ;但净资产负债率对非国有企业则形成显著的压力。这说明传统计划体制下的预算软约束问题仍然没有消失。我们的研究还表明 ,随着时间的推移 ,行政隶属关系和所有制性质本身对企业生存提供的保护作用正在递减。 Using a unique dataset from Zhongguancun Science Park of Beijing, this paper explores the determinants of high-tech firm survival, especially the effects of firm efficiency, net-debt ratio, and ownership on the hazard rate of exit. Our main finding is that firm efficiency has increasingly become the primary factor in affecting the chance of survival in the Zhongguancun Science Park, indicating the growing significance of market forces as a result of China's economic reforms since late 1970s. However, as a legacy of the planning economy, the “soft budget constraint' syndrome still remains: while net-debt ratio positively and significantly affects the hazard rate of exit for non-state-owned firms, its overall effect on the government-owned firms is not significant, and decreases with the level of the government to which the firms are affiliated. We also find a declining role of state ownership in protecting the survival of firms over the sample period.

作者张维迎周黎安顾全林

机构地区北京大学光华管理学院北京大学经济学院

出处《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第10期3-14,共12页 Economic Research Journal

基金国家自然科学基金委"杰出青年基金"(70 0 2 5 2 0 1)资助

关键词经济转型企业退出机制北京中关村科技园区高科技企业企业负债所有制性质制约因素企业净资产负债率行政隶属关系预算软约束 Firm Exit Soft Budget Constraint Economic Transition

分类号 F270 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献18

1中关村科技园区管委会.《中关村科技园区发展报告2001》，内部报告[R].,2002..
2Ahn, S ,2001,"Firm Dynamics and Productivity Growth: a Review of Micro Evidence from OECD Countries", OECD working paper NO.297, OECD, Paris.
3Audretsch, D and T Mahmood, 1994, "The Rate of Hazard Confronting New Firms and Plants in US Manufacturing", Review of Industrial Organization, Vol.9, pp.41-56.
4Audretsch, D and T Mahmood, 1995, "New Firm Survival : New Results Using a Hazard Function", Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.77, pp97- 103.
5Audretsch, D , P Houweling and A R Thurik, 1997, "New-finn Survival: Industry Versus Firm Effects", Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers, Tinbergen Institute.
6Bartelsman, E J , S Scarpetta, and F Schivardi,2003,"Comparative Analysis of Firm Demographics and Survival: Micro-level Evidence for the OECD Countries", OECD working paper NO. 348.
7Bernard, A and J B Jenson,1999,"Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effects or Both", Journal of International Economics, Vol.47, pp3-31.
8Caves, R E, 1998," Industrial Organization and New Findings on the Turnover and Mobility of Firms", Journal of Economic Literature, 36(4) ,pp. 1947-82.
9Che, J and Y Qian, 1998, "Institutional Environment, Community Govermment, and Corporate Governance: Understanding China' s Township-Village Enterprises", Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol.14, pp.1-23.
10Dunne, T, M.Roberts and L Samuelson, 1989,"The Growth and Failure of US Manufacturing Plants", Quarterly Journal of Economics,Vol. 104, pp.671-98.