摘要
目的 :探讨3种方案治疗不稳定型心绞痛的经济效果。方法 :将88例不稳定型心绞痛患者分为3组 ,方案1:给予硝酸异山梨酯、阿司匹林、硝苯地平、硝酸甘油 ;方案2:在方案1的基础上加用丹参注射液 ;方案3 :在方案1的基础上加用葛根素注射液。运用药物经济学进行成本 -效果分析。结果 :方案2与方案3的有效率明显高于方案1(P<0 05) ,方案2与方案3相似 (P>0 05) ;成本 -效果比 ,方案1为15 98 ,方案2为18 02 ,方案3为33 40 ;增量成本 -效果比 ,与方案1比 ,方案2为24 66 ,方案3为83 90;与方案2比 ,方案3为643 60。结论
OBJECTIVE:To analyze the cost of three schemes in treatment of unstable angina pectoris METHODS:88 patients with unstable angina pectoris were divided into three groups:group Ⅰ was given isosorbide,asprin,nifedipine and nitroglycerin;group Ⅱ was given isosorbide,asprin,nifedipine,nitroglycerin and red sage injection and group Ⅲ was given isosorbide,asprin,nifedipine,nitroglycerin and puerarin;then using pharmacoeconomic method,cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out RESULTS:The efficacy in the group Ⅱ and group Ⅲ was higher than that in group Ⅰ(P<0 05),the efficacy in group Ⅱ was comparable to that in group Ⅲ(P>0 05),and the E/C(effectiveness/cost) of the three groups were 15 98,18 02 and 33 40 respectively Compared with group Ⅰ,ΔC/ΔE of group Ⅱ and Ⅲ were 24 66,83 90 respectively;Compared with group Ⅱ,ΔC/ΔE of group Ⅲ was 643 60 CONCLUSION:The scheme for group Ⅱ is the best one
出处
《中国医院用药评价与分析》
2002年第3期158-159,共2页
Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-use in Hospitals of China
