摘要
目的 探讨社区髋部骨折患者主动锻炼和被动锻炼在功能恢复方面的差异。方法 随机将社区 84例髋部骨折患者分为被动治疗组 (被动运动 +综合治疗 ) 4 3例 ,主动治疗组 (主动锻炼 +综合治疗 ) 4 1例 ,接受 8周的康复运动治疗 ,对治疗前后两组病例进行Harris评分。结果 主动组病例 2 4例 80分以上 ,被动组病例 11例 80分以上 ,两组间差别有显著性意义 (P <0 0 1)。结论 主动锻炼法比被动锻炼更能改善社区髋部骨折患者的肢体功能 ,提高生活质量。
Objective To explore the difference of recovery from hip fracture between active exercise and passive aimless exercise.Methods 84 cases were randomly divided into two groups,43 cases of control group (passive exercise with integrated treatment) and 41 cases of treatment group (active exercise with integrated treatment).The results of evaluation in two groups was compared and evaluated on the basis of Harris Hip Function Classification after 8 weeks treatment.Results After the treatment,in active group,the scores of Harris Hip Function Classification in 24 cases were above 80 points,in passive group there were only 11 cases,there were significant differences between the two groups(P<0.01).Conclusion The active exercise can enhance function recovery and improve patients′living quality.
出处
《中国全科医学》
CAS
CSCD
2003年第10期855-856,共2页
Chinese General Practice
