期刊文献+

理论语法与汉语教学——从“是”的句法功能谈起 被引量:18

Theoretic grammar and Chinese language teaching
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文讨论强调句式中"是"和"的"的句法地位,结论为:前者不是系动词,后者不是动词名物化的标记.汉语的动词可以名词化,动词短语也可以名物化,但两个过程都不牵涉具体的形态标记.这些虽然是理论问题,但常常会在汉语教学中以不同的形式表现出来,汉语教师需要具备一定的理论知识才能真正做好教学工作. SHI Dingxu, It is argued in this paper that the morpheme shì in an emphatic sentence is not a copula and the morpheme de in the same sentence is not a marker for nominalization. Verbs and verb phrases in Chinese can be nominalized, but there is no overt marker for it. These complicated issues often show up in Chinese language teaching and Chinese teachers should have some knowledge of theoretic grammar.
作者 石定栩
出处 《世界汉语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第2期5-12,共8页 Chinese Teaching in the World
关键词 理论语法 汉语教学 “是……的” “是” 句法功能 理论语法知识 emphatic marker shì emphatic marker de nominalization theoretic grammar and language teaching
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Hashimoto, Ann (1969) Embedded Structures in Mandarin, P. O. L. A. 12, Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
  • 2Li, Charles and Sandra Thompson (1981) Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • 3Shi, Dingxu (1994) The Nature of Chinese Emphatic Sentences. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 3.81--100.

同被引文献169

引证文献18

二级引证文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部