摘要
比较赵树理和张平 ,从文学观上看 ,他们都是自觉地要做公众的代言人。从作品所反映的题材看 ,赵树理仅限于农村和农民 ;而张平却广泛得多 ,既有农村和农民 (《天网》) ,也有工厂和工人 (《抉择》) ,还有公安干警 (《十面埋伏》)、学生 (《对面的女孩》)等。从揭示社会矛盾方面看 ,张平要比赵树理更深刻和更尖锐一些。从人物刻画上看 ,赵树理的功力显然比张平要厚重 ,他笔下的许多人物性格鲜明 ,活灵活现 ,能给读者留下难忘的印象 ;而张平作品中的人物 ,还有简单化、平面化、理念化之痕。从故事设置和叙述方式上看 ,赵树理特别重视故事的吸引力 ,很少用心理描写和理性分析 ,追求的是让读者一口气读下去的效果 ;而张平则恰恰相反 ,经常使用大段的心理描写和理性分析 ,要把自己的爱憎情感鲜明地表达出来 ,这样的叙述方式对于深化主题是很有作用的 ,但同时却冲淡了作品的艺术性。赵树理和张平选择做公众代言人的文学道路 ,虽然走得比较艰难 ,但他们都不后悔 ,也不退却 ,这是非常可贵的。在转型时期的当今中国社会 ,仍然需要赵树理和张平式的作家。
Comparing ZHAO Shu-li and ZHANG Ping from literature point of view, they both act conscientiously as public prolocutors. From the subjects in their works, ZHAO Shu-lis works are limited to country life and farmers, whereas ZHANG Pings subjects are much wider in range from country life and farmers (Sky Net), to factories and workers (Choice), from policemen (Ambush) to students (Girl Facing Me). From the point of view of revealing social contradictions, ZHANG Ping is more profound and sharper. From the depiction of characters, ZHAO Shu-li is obviously more experienced, as his characters are mostly vivid, lively and memorable; whereas from those created by ZHANG Ping sighs of simplification and conception can be observed. Form the plots and ways of narration, ZHAO Shu-li pays great attention to the attraction of tales with little psychological and rational analysis, so as to enable readers to read on end; but ZHANG Pings works are just opposite. He often applies to psychological and rational analysis in great length to show clearly his own sensibilities, which is functional in the deepening of the theme, but in the mean time the artistic value of the works is weakened. It is worshipful that both ZHAO Shu-li and ZHANG Ping choose to be the public prolocutors, and they never regret nor retreat in difficulty. In the present social transformation period, China still need writers like ZHAO Shuli and ZHANG Ping.
出处
《太原师范学院学报（社会科学版）》
2003年第1期76-79,共4页
Journal of Taiyuan Normal University:Social Science Edition
