摘要
采用文献资料法、比较法,对《大学生体育合格标准(试行方案)》与《学生体质健康标准》在测试项目、评分体系和等级评定方面进行对比,认为《学生体质健康标准》更客观、更科学,同时在实施中也体现出更强的可操作性、合理性和激励性。
Adopting the methods of documentary data and comparison,this paper compares standards for college students' Physical Training Qualification (trial program) and Standards for Students' Constitutional Fintness in the aspects of test events,scoring system and grade assessment,and analyses that Standards for Student's for Student's Constitutional Fitness reflects more objectively that building up college students' health mainly depends on the improvement of their constitutions,and it also shows more practicality,rationality and insprirability.
出处
《南阳师范学院学报》
CAS
2003年第9期102-105,共4页
Journal of Nanyang Normal University
关键词
《大学生体育合格标准》
《学生体质健康标准》
评分体系
等级评定
测试项目
Standards for College Students' Physical Training Qualification (trial program)
Standards for students' Constitutional Fitness
comparison
study
