期刊文献+

“性与天道”问题与宋明理学分系 被引量:13

Problem of "Nature and Heavenly Tao" and the Distinction of Schools of Neo-Confucianism in the Song and Ming Dynasties
原文传递
导出
摘要  "性与天道"问题是中国本体论哲学的基本思想资源,在孔孟以后却被儒家所丢弃。魏晋玄学家以对性与天道的新解走出了沉闷的汉代天人之辨。唐宋以后儒家的复兴实际上是"复性",理学家由复性开始了对性与天道的自觉体认。他们既接续了性与天道的源头,又因对复性的不同把握而开发出不同的本体范畴,推演出不同的理论体系。胡宏总结"五子"的"性"论和儒家传统的"尽性"要求,以"成性"解"尽性",并最终建立起区别于气学、道学(小理学)及后来的心学的性学理论系统,中国哲学发展由此有了整体的"理学"。 Problem of 'Nature and Heavenly Tao' is abandoned by Confucians from Han to Tang Dynasties though it is a basic source of thought to Chinese philosophy of ontology. The philosophers of Wei and Jin Dynasties broke through the dull arguments between heaven and man according to their new views. The Confucian revival after Tang Dynasty was essentially the 'restoration of nature', from which the NeoConfucians created the distinct theoretical systems of NeoConfucianism and the categories of noumena on the basis of their conscious cognition of 'Nature and Heavenly Tao'. Hu Hong interpreted the 'full development of nature' as the 'completion of nature' in term of his sumup of the different viewpoints of nature and schools in the North Song Dynasty. He founded the School of Nature which distinguished from schools of material force, heavenly principle or mind. Thus, NeoConfucianism as a whole was formally founded.
作者 向世陵
出处 《中国人民大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第4期126-132,共7页 Journal of Renmin University of China
关键词 “性与天道”问题 宋明理学 中国 本体论 胡宏 儒家 性学理论 “天道” “性” Nature and Heavenly Tao restoration of Nature school of Nature distinction of schools of Neo-Confucianism
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1《善恶之上—胡宏·性学·理学》,北京,中国广播电视出版社,2000.
  • 2《宋明理学分系概说》,载方克立主编《湘学》第二辑,251—276页,长沙,湖南人民出版社,2002.

同被引文献47

引证文献13

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部