期刊文献+

“非典”时期的“典型”反应——评“两高”的一个刑事司法解释 被引量:28

The "Typical Reaction" in the Period of "SARS"——a Remark on a Criminal Judicial Interpretation by "Two Highs
原文传递
导出
摘要 最高人民法院、最高人民检察院联合发布的《关于办理妨害预防、控制突发传染病疫情等灾害的刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》有值得商榷之处。一是该《解释》第 1条具有极强的扩张性和灵活性 ;二是《解释》第 6条中以非法经营罪定罪的行为范围很难确定 ;三是《解释》第 1 0条第 1款将编造或故意传播与突发传染病疫情等灾害有关的恐怖信息的行为以编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪定罪处罚 ,对此 。 Some points in the Interpretation of Some Issues Concerning Concrete Application of Law to Handling the Criminal Cases Relating to Impairing Preventing or Controlling the Disasters such as the Epidemic Situation of the Suddenly Broken out Infectious Diseases are open to question. Firstly, the first article of the Interpretation possesses quite strong expansion and flexibility. Secondly, in the article 6 of the Interpretation, the act scope of conviction of the crime of illegal business operation is hard to define. Thirdly, the first paragraph of the 10th article of the Interpretation punishes the act of fabricating and intentionally spreading the horrible information with respect to the epidemic situation of the suddenly broken out infectious diseases as the crime of fabricating and intentionally spreading false horrible information. Therefore, the striking scope shall be strictly controlled in judicial practice.
作者 曲新久
机构地区 中国政法大学
出处 《政法论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第3期157-161,共5页 Tribune of Political Science and Law
关键词 “非典”时期 刑法 司法解释 非法经营罪 突发性传染病疫情 “编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪” Prevention Control Suddenly Broken out Infectious Disease Criminal Judicial Interpretation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1.最高人民法院副院长黄松有就人身损害赔偿的司法解释答记者问[N].人民法院报,2003-12-30.
  • 2孙军工.解读《关于办理妨害预防、控制突发传染病疫情等灾害的刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》[N].人民法院报,2003—05—16,(4).
  • 3高铭喧.传播突发传染病病原体行为适用法律解读[N].人民法院报,2003—05—18,(1).

共引文献4

同被引文献302

引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部