2Kim HS,Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, et al. The Impact of Sex Differences on Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention : A FAME ( Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation ) Substudy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv ,2012,5 : 1037-1042.
3Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary- artery stenoses. N Engl J Med, 1996,334:1703-1708.
4Iskander S, Iskandrian AE. Risk assessment using single-photon emission computed tomographic technetium-99m sestamibi imaging. J Am Coil Cardiol,1998 ,32 :57-62.
5Kern MJ, Samady H. Current concepts of integrated coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2010,55 : 173-185.
6Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J,2010,31:2501-2555.
7Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med,2009,360:213-224.
8Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coil C ardiol, 2007,49 : 2105 -2111.
9Miller LH, Toklu B, Rauch J, et al. Very long-term clinical follow-up after fractional flow reserve-guided coronary revascularization. J Invasive Cardio1,2012,24 : 309 -315.
10Falk E, Shah PK, Fuster V. Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation, 1995,92:657-671.
